Author Topic: Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news  (Read 468 times)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Good read, both pro and con, on presidential hopeful BHO and the military establishments trepidation about his qualifications despite assurances that he supports a strong military.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080226/NATION/476716884/1001

Very important topic.

Also, McCain appears to be downsizing his view of the long term role of US forces in Iraq amid increasing stability....the hundred years comment is cannon fodder or so it appears.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/25/iraq.mccain/index.html
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 01:16:58 PM »
"We're very concerned about his apparent lack of understanding on the threat of radical Islam to the United States," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, who is pro-Iraq war and a Fox News analyst. "A lot of retired senior officers feel the same way."

Wow - A FOX News analyst thinks Obama is unfit to lead? Seriously? You must be joking. And he's pro-war, go figure...

The Bush administration has been so good to the military community over the last few years, I can totally see why they would want to stick with the GOP.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/01/11/generals/

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2008, 01:30:41 PM »
dos, do you support a rapid and unconditional pull-out of all US forces from Iraq?  I believe thats Obamas position.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 01:37:18 PM »
obama will go to Iraq and give motivational speeches, he will tell al quida to fight for change and to have hope of victory.

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2008, 02:09:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dos Equis
[BWow - A FOX News analyst thinks Obama is unfit to lead? Seriously? You must be joking. And he's pro-war, go figure...

did you have another link? I didnt see where anyone said he was unfit to lead....

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2008, 05:09:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
dos, do you support a rapid and unconditional pull-out of all US forces from Iraq?  I believe thats Obamas position.


I don't know that it is. He's supported a bill to draw down troop levels in 2008, one that is mostly political theater as it will go nowhere. Nothing will happen until 2009, if he were to ostensibly take office.

At that point, I believe Obama to be a pragmatist, and has perhaps shared his thoughts inside the party if not outside - and would mostly support the three-way split as proposed here:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LbzLog3_EWs&feature=related

Bush once said that the US military will stand down when the Iraqis stand up. Well, guess what? With the exception of say the current president of Iraq, there isn't much of a trained political class in Iraq anymore. People of affluence have left.

Without some transitional period, it will become... as Hitchens has stated, the Congo of the Middle East. It will draw direct intervention, I mean if you think it's bad now with the Turks bombing the Kurds up north, heck... you could expect to see a Turkish moon flag flying in Baghdad if the Americans leave.

What has tainted all of this is the gross mismanagement of the whole situation. Perhaps there isn't another company besides KBR that can coordinate the massive logistics of building Fort Bremer in the Iraqi desert and setting up a KFC, Taco Bell and Baskin-Robbins within it, as well as handling all the latrines, water, power, etc etc. Perhaps not. But we're not building out Iraqi infrastructure fast enough, and the burn rate against the economy makes no sense. We're making war profiteers rich, killing American service people, and there is no sense of the end game - and to boot, we're not executing the actual objective - which was to have American oil interests control the oil and use it against the Saudis. THAT IS WHAT IRAQ WAS ABOUT. Establish a base in the middle east, take the oil, and create hegemony against the Saudi empire. THAT WAS IT, that was the strategy.

And right now, it isn't working. The Iranians are funneling in groups directing more efficient attacks, allied with the Sunnis - and the Kurds are fighting the Turks, and the Baathists are re-organizing and you have Taliban interests there as well. Control is a relative word. It's just getting to be too damn expensive to run this war.

So, I've said it plenty of times around here, you can pull troops back to cover the oil fields in the east north of Basra and the SW fields. Baghdad is worthless, we've taken all the data from the oil ministry. Leave. Let street fighting reign.

Let's at least make Iraq's balance sheet work out. If we leave, as in really leave, then Jordan, Syria, the Saudis, the Iranians and the Turks will ALL move troops into take the areas and split it by force.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 05:43:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dos Equis

[ THAT IS WHAT IRAQ WAS ABOUT. Establish a base in the middle east, take the oil, and create hegemony against the Saudi empire. THAT WAS IT, that was the strategy.
 


"take the oil"? could you explain that statement?

where did they take the oil to?

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2008, 05:56:54 PM »
Errr... I'm 15 but I do know my politics. For 1 fact, McCain isnt even conservative, he just wont switch to liberal because they wont give him a high seat in the party. Another fact, whoever runs our country is gonna mess it up now, the media will dump on McCain so the real question is who is gonna be our next democratic president? Hillary "Satan" Clinton?? OR Barack Obama?? Clinton News Network (CNN), News to Benefit Clinton (NBC) will make up stories and be making up and putting up stuff worse than what was thrown at Bush in the '04 election. Actually it will prolbably dwarf it since they really really want Hillary to be elected. I'm actually waiting for Hillary to come up with something really really bad about obama. (suprised it hasnt already happened)
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2008, 06:03:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
"take the oil"? could you explain that statement?

where did they take the oil to?


Literally where? To tankers they controlled.

They took it out of the hands of the French and Chinese companies that had made deals with Saddam for exclusive rights over the oil fields.

In 1997, as the sanctions lost international support, Russia’s Lukoil, France’s Total, China National and other companies struck deals with the government of Iraq for production sharing in some of Iraq’s biggest and most lucrative fields.

Lukoil reached an agreement for West Qurna, Total got Majnoun, while China National signed on for North Rumaila.

Paris, Moscow and Beijing, as Permanent Members in the UN Security Council pressed for an easing of the sanctions, with support from a growing number of other countries. Ostensibly concerned about Iraq’s humanitarian crisis (let's be honest, nobody gives a damn about Iraqis in the rest of the world), called on the UN Security Council to end the sanctions forthwith.

In 1998, the US companies saw the writing on the wall. With Iranian fields already slipping into the hands of competitors, such losses in Iraq threatened to reduce them to second rank.

The companies stepped up their lobbying in Washington and made their wishes for Iraq oil crystal clear. “Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas – reserves I’d love Chevron to have access to,” enthused Chevron CEO Kenneth T. Derr in a speech at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco in 1998.

US-UK forces invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003, seizing the major oilfields and refineries almost immediately. When coalition forces later entered Baghdad, they set a protective cordon around the Oil Ministry with its thousands of valuable seismic maps safe for future oil exploration.

Bush appointed Phil Carroll, a former high-ranking US oil executive, to assume control of Iraq’s oil industry and on May 22, Bush issued Executive Order 13303 giving immunity to oil companies for all activities in Iraq and deals involving Iraqi oil.

On the same day the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1483 which lifted the former sanctions and allowed the occupation authorities to sell Iraqi oil on the open market and put the proceeds in an account they controlled.

Now - who WERE the occupation authorities? Phil Carroll. And who did he give the work to?

You can guess.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dos Equis
Literally where? To tankers they controlled.

They took it out of the hands of the French and Chinese companies that had made deals with Saddam for exclusive rights over the oil fields.

In 1997, as the sanctions lost international support, Russia’s Lukoil, France’s Total, China National and other companies struck deals with the government of Iraq for production sharing in some of Iraq’s biggest and most lucrative fields.

Lukoil reached an agreement for West Qurna, Total got Majnoun, while China National signed on for North Rumaila.

Paris, Moscow and Beijing, as Permanent Members in the UN Security Council pressed for an easing of the sanctions, with support from a growing number of other countries. Ostensibly concerned about Iraq’s humanitarian crisis (let's be honest, nobody gives a damn about Iraqis in the rest of the world), called on the UN Security Council to end the sanctions forthwith.

In 1998, the US companies saw the writing on the wall. With Iranian fields already slipping into the hands of competitors, such losses in Iraq threatened to reduce them to second rank.

The companies stepped up their lobbying in Washington and made their wishes for Iraq oil crystal clear. “Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas – reserves I’d love Chevron to have access to,” enthused Chevron CEO Kenneth T. Derr in a speech at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco in 1998.

US-UK forces invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003, seizing the major oilfields and refineries almost immediately. When coalition forces later entered Baghdad, they set a protective cordon around the Oil Ministry with its thousands of valuable seismic maps safe for future oil exploration.

Bush appointed Phil Carroll, a former high-ranking US oil executive, to assume control of Iraq’s oil industry and on May 22, Bush issued Executive Order 13303 giving immunity to oil companies for all activities in Iraq and deals involving Iraqi oil.

On the same day the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1483 which lifted the former sanctions and allowed the occupation authorities to sell Iraqi oil on the open market and put the proceeds in an account they controlled.

Now - who WERE the occupation authorities? Phil Carroll. And who did he give the work to?

You can guess.


Jeez, at LEAST give credit to the text you copied and pasted. Even *I* give credit when I copy paste with quotes or italics.  :rolleyes:

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/2003companiesiniraq.htm

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Barack Hussein Obama and the military establishment and McCain news
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2008, 07:24:21 PM »
If we leave, as in really leave, then Jordan, Syria, the Saudis, the Iranians and the Turks will ALL move troops into take the areas and split it by force.
====
I think what we need to understand here is what would Obama do with Iraq as  president.   Thats the issue.......and like so many other issues for barack, no one seems to know for certain if he would stay and act as stabilizer for 100 years if necessary, leave immediately, pull back shortly, redeploy tomorrow, reconfigure and realign in the weeks and months ahead.........
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns