Author Topic: P39 damage.  (Read 2695 times)

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
P39 damage.
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2008, 04:30:28 AM »
"Hit the prop reduction gear housing or prop dome and you could have an oil leak over the wind screen."

IIRC P39s sometimes suffered from oil leaking from the gearbox and smearing the windshield.

"Bodhi, im not sure if it used oil up in the transfer case, or just heavy duty grease."

I don't think that is possible in that kind of application. It needs transmission oil as any heavy duty transmission gearbox.

It would be interesting to know if the gearbox was in oil circulation with the engine. That would mean tubes running to and from engine to gearbox.

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Rebel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
P39 damage.
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2008, 07:54:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by angelsandair
Well, since the P-39 was supposed to protect the pilot, i bet you cant see ANYTHING behind you.


Actually, it was the design of the P-39 cockpit that lead to the development of the full fledged bubble canopy in other fighters.  

Pilots of the P39 disagreed on many accounts (the more experienced being more positive, the less experienced more severe) about the flying characteristics (such as the tumble that the test pilots couldn't replicate), but they all agreed on one major point- it had "Fantastic visibility".
"You rebel scum"

Offline Hazard69

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 748
P39 damage.
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2008, 08:03:01 AM »
It'll be interesting to see the PW model on the P39. If the pilot gets hit as easily on the 38s (because theres no engine up front), then we know, that the 38 model is correct. If not, then I guess its the prop that saves him.:eek: :lol
<S> Hazardus

The loveliest thing of which one could sing, this side of the Heavenly Gates,
Is no blonde or brunette from a Hollywood set, but an escort of P38s.

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
P39 damage.
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2008, 08:23:45 AM »
Looked around.



Ignorance is bliss, now im not so bliss full anymore.
Kinda a laugh how the first thing noted, is the gear box oil tank. :cry



This logic if implemented is sure to make people say WTF!? for years to come when the nose gets hit, they get blinded by oil, the engine keeps runing on flawless untill the transfer case lock's up, spining the aircraft to the ground.

Other pictures and info found here.

http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/P-39.html

*This ones best*
http://www.airpages.ru/cgi-bin/epg.pl?nav=us10&page=p39_01

:aok
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 08:36:48 AM by BaDkaRmA158Th »
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
P39 damage.
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2008, 08:46:38 AM »
"when the nose gets hit, they get blinded by oil"

I have a feeling that it's not going to be modelled but only the rear engine oil tank effects.

Good find BTW. :aok

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: P39 damage.
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2008, 09:45:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by VansCrew1
Since the engine is mounted behind the pilot who would a old leak affect the cockpit? would you be able to see oil on the back of the windscreen? Also would the shaft running from the engine to the prop be sustainable to damage?


This question, about oil, was already answered in one of the original P-39 threads.

The answer was "NO"


wrngway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
P39 damage.
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2008, 10:43:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BaDkaRmA158Th
Bodhi, im not sure if it used oil up in the transfer case, or just heavy duty grease.


The prop pitch on the P-39 is controlled by oil pressure.  As far as I can recall, the oil pressure for the prop pitch on the P-39 was provided by the engine like a P-51, B-25, F6F, or F4u.  Lose oil pressure, and you lose the propellor pitch (RPM) control.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
P39 damage.
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2008, 11:09:45 AM »
Look at the thick frames around the car doors, the top-side frames, and then look at the very narrow rear view almost entirely blocked by the air intake scoop.


Ain't nobody seeing nothin' out the back o' that thing!

I think visibility will be the worst of any plane we've had since the 190s were redone, but that's just a guess based on the thickness and placement of the framing.

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
P39 damage.
« Reply #23 on: February 27, 2008, 11:42:29 AM »
Why would the P-39 get a new and complex damage model when no other model does? I'm not thinking this is likely.
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Mid engine
« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2008, 11:56:56 AM »
And given its a mid engined plane a P39 should it react differently when shot down.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
P39 damage.
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2008, 12:01:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Look at the thick frames around the car doors, the top-side frames, and then look at the very narrow rear view almost entirely blocked by the air intake scoop.


Ain't nobody seeing nothin' out the back o' that thing!

I think visibility will be the worst of any plane we've had since the 190s were redone, but that's just a guess based on the thickness and placement of the framing.

I think you're in for a surprise.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 12:39:37 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline VansCrew1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2377
P39 damage.
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2008, 02:51:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by angelsandair
Well, since the P-39 was supposed to protect the pilot, i bet you cant see ANYTHING behind you.


The P39Q was overhauled by the russians to make it better. They took most of the armament out.
Tour 79
Callsign: VansCrew


"The Ringer"

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15737
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
P39 damage.
« Reply #27 on: February 27, 2008, 02:56:51 PM »
With regard to vulnerability of the engine to enemy fire from behind, I would guess that the P-39 would be similar to the P-38, since both have engines that are not in front of pilot-protecting armor plate.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
P39 damage.
« Reply #28 on: February 27, 2008, 03:19:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by VansCrew1
The P39Q was overhauled by the russians to make it better. They took most of the armament out.



Are we getting the Q? I thought we were getting the N?

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
P39 damage.
« Reply #29 on: February 27, 2008, 03:39:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Are we getting the Q? I thought we were getting the N?



January 25, 2008
Aces High II: P-39Q Development Screenshots

From
http://www.flyaceshigh.com/frindex.html
See Rule #4