I have to say that was really reaching there. Basing an aggravation of an already existing condition and using that to justify blaming the vaccine for the autism cases. Looking at an argument raised in the article, there is also no proof that the underlying condition would not have manifested itself absent the vaccine either.
If someone has some real proof to show that the vaccines cause autism it would be nice to see or hear it. So far it's all claims and no one Haas the scientific evidence to show otherwise yet. If there is evidence or proof, fine lets deal with it. To me it seems that some parents are looking for someone else to foot the bills for their admittedly tragic situation and vaccines are a convenient target like suing an obstetrician when a baby is born with defects.
