Author Topic: So why isn't Widewing on the HTC payroll?  (Read 947 times)

Offline wooly15

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 332
Re: So why isn't Widewing on the HTC payroll?
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2008, 08:32:39 AM »

Satisfaction comes when your hardware performs in the field exactly as intended. For example, we designed and manufacture a cryogenic system and a separate impact sensor for the Standard Missile-3. You probably recall that this was the missile that recently took down that broken spy satellite. It's a hoot when the hardware does something on the cutting edge.





Awesome WW.  I was stationed on the Lake Erie '00-'04 and was part of the crew who did all of the flight test missions for the SM-3. Fun stuff.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: So why isn't Widewing on the HTC payroll?
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2008, 05:30:43 PM »
Widewing, that's awesome  :)

Since you appreciate the QC part of design implementation.. What's your opinion on the chances of new private companies like Bigelow and others to catch up to government space agencies? 

Unlike government agencies, corporations have to answer to stockholders. Thus, waste is minimized. I think that these companies have an excellent chance at competing with NASA within the realm of earth orbiting spacecraft, as long as they place adequate emphasis on flight safety.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.