Originally posted by Maverick
Really, and you base this on what? His voting as "present" instead of taking a stand, including one of his own bills.
Frankly I see him as bad, if not worse than hillary. That's not because of his skin color in the least but because he says different things in different places on the same items. This tells me he is just as bad as hillary in pursuit of power. The fact that he does not list specifics in his plan for "change" or really say what he intends to do leaves the door wide open for whatever he may want to do. He is very successful in talking vague generalities and not being as strident as hillary. That tells me he is far more subtle and able to slide things past out of public view. No one is calling him out on his "change" and that is more than a bit scary.
Yea but during the clinton years form 92-00, the Chinese got all of this nuclear technology that they couldnt get even near enough information before the clinton reign of 92-00. I'm not pointing fingers but I'm piecing 2 and 2 together. But hey lets have the Chinese get their way. Plus the media will rip on John McCain so bad, he will have a heart attack (I like John McCain, just feel sorry for what the media will make up about him.)
Plus there is also CNN and NBC clinton controls (CNN=Clinton News Network, NBC= News to Benefit Clinton). Ya know what NBC said to make bush look bad and congress look good? Listen to the quote. "President George Bush's disapproval rating is 65 percent while Congress's approval rating is 30 percent." Who looks better? Bush or Congress at first glance?
