problem is the people on the extreme end of the scale that "suffer" more that the guys in the middle. These guys seem to think the other end of the scale is ruining there game, and vice verser...
if there was a scale of -10 (furballer) to + 10 (toolsheder/war player) id stick myself at a 2. I prefer simulated war/ land grab, but im perfectly fine furballing (at least trying) for hours too. and as Lusche said, people in the middle dont care or dont speak up about it, because once one battle ends, they create another one, which could turn into a furball, or could turn into a base capture...
guys at -10 or +10 are always going to be whining about something. (bodhi "fun police" thread is a classic example of a few kids throwing there toys out of the pram)
Personally id put the game at maybe -2... strat system that doesnt really "do" anything big, poor HQ target and 163s are too cheap. But at least its right in the middle roughly.
a little chart.
war winners10, Grillman (knits Army group A leader
)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2, Overlag
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10 Bodhi, Hubs, Slapshot, Laz,
furballersadd ya names in where u think you go