Author Topic: spit 5  (Read 766 times)

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: spit 5
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2008, 05:04:06 PM »
Never hear of the CCC Spit V?

No, but I've heard of the spit V. It's in every magazine about planes basically. Never hear about anything else. Dont want it, just wondering.
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: spit 5
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2008, 06:26:52 PM »
2nd TAF did not operate mixed grps of Spitfires within squadrons. They operated either XVIs or IXs, not both.

443 RCAF and others operated standard tipped XVIs alongside clipped XVIs.

Wether the XVIs were "produced" clipped is a moot point, wingtips were modifed (on or off) at the squadron level, so on actual operations, they could be either.

...was going to add the reason why they did not mix IXs and XVIs was because the Packard Merlins on the XVIs were built to metric standards, and the tools needed to service the engines were different than the IXs. Also, many parts were not interchangeable, screw sizes were different (metric and imperial), ect.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2008, 07:09:38 PM by Squire »
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: spit 5
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2008, 11:41:38 PM »
I guess then my books must be wrong, but I found color picture of XVIs with non-clipped wings. So either the spit in question is not really an XVI or the caption is wrong.

I'm with Kev on this one.  They came off the line clipped as they were being sent in to 2 TAF for essentially ground attack work.  There were some that had tips fitted in the field.  Stan Turner's XVI had tips added.  He was a Wing Commander at the time.  Part of the problem with the photos is many of the squadrons went from IXs to XVIs and it's really only serial numbers that tell whether it's an IX or an XVI

Remember that it was a simple mod to add or remove the tips.  But Production line photos seem to show the XVIs coming off the line clipped for the job they were going to do which was down low.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: spit 5
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2008, 12:36:23 AM »
...was going to add the reason why they did not mix IXs and XVIs was because the Packard Merlins on the XVIs were built to metric standards, and the tools needed to service the engines were different than the IXs. Also, many parts were not interchangeable, screw sizes were different (metric and imperial), ect.
Agh? The Packards were built to ASA/USAS  (ANSI from Oct 1966) standards not metric afaik. British engines were built to BA standards

On tools for bolts, the Americans measure across the flats while the British measure across the points, for wrench sizes.

American Acme threads are not metric.