Author Topic: 109 information?  (Read 1022 times)

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
109 information?
« on: June 15, 2008, 10:19:48 AM »
You skinners are going to start dreading my name in a bit with all the stupid posts Ive put up, but heres another one. I just found a picture of a few cool 109's. I can only guess their Emils as its from a BoB book (I know, I know, not very accurate) and I was just wondering if anyone could shed anymore light on these planes. Could be fun to do. The picture looks as if it was taken in the field as opposes to a test flight.



Fraid thats the best and only photo I have of them, and the quality isn't the best either. Any offers?
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline croduh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2008, 11:17:43 AM »
Early 109, metal like this?



Here is a better quality photo:



The second photo is from 1941, so it might be 109e?
« Last Edit: June 15, 2008, 11:25:47 AM by croduh »

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2008, 11:26:22 AM »
cant see your first one, just that annoying wee red cross. Yea bare metal, any idea as to what JG it was from?
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline croduh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2008, 11:30:10 AM »
First one disappeared for me too.

On the other hand, 109e-1:



109e4:




Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2008, 11:49:38 AM »
Not bare metal.  Pre B of B, Battle of France, Invasion of Poland type camo scheme before they moved the camo further down the fuselage sides.

Photo is 39-40 time frame so E-1s would be my guess based on the lack of cannon barrels extended from the wing.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2008, 11:50:42 AM »
So is this going to be another thread ive started that ends in a 'NO SKIN' answer?
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2008, 08:44:45 PM »
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6638
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2008, 08:59:05 PM »
<drool> i would stop flying the solid black Emil if we had this
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2008, 09:24:49 PM »
Really... damn thats basically my Emil template  :lol

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2008, 03:55:57 PM »
Motherland, mind putting up some pics of your template bird? I'm curous as to how you did your rivets.

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2008, 06:59:28 AM »
After having done a fair bit of picture scouring in order to figure out the most accurate way to reproduce the 109's rivets (and subsequently re-doing my entire 109 template) I believe that the best way to do the rivets is to draw each rivet as a 1 pixel black dot and to either use a layer effect on it and give the dots an 'external glow' in white or duplicate the original layer of black dots and drop the duplicate (in white) underneath the black dots and use a small gaussian blur to bring a 'halo' effect out from beneath the black dots.

I believe Fencer uses a similar technique on his JG 11 K4.

The 109's rivets were depressed, not raised, and that black with a white border gives that 'sunken' visual effect.

The standard '1 black, 1 white side-by-side' gives a raised effect, suitable for other aircraft but not the 109.

I shall be re-doing my 190 template too, once I get around to it, and replacing the rivets on my A5 as they were done in the 'raised' style.

Some may disagree with the rivets being too subtle that way but that's how they were and that's what I'll be sticking to.


Furthermore, I believe it was common practice for ze Germans to apply a layer of filler and then remove the excess so if you wanted to get really pissy about it there wouldn't be very much at all in the way of visible rivets.


« Last Edit: June 17, 2008, 07:01:44 AM by Xasthur »
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 109 information?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2008, 07:04:33 AM »
Really... damn thats basically my Emil template  :lol

Go get some, Bubi.   :aok
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.