Author Topic: Impressions of the 39  (Read 4182 times)

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #45 on: March 27, 2008, 07:15:08 PM »
No, like stall limiter, its a sign your a vet, right? ;)

In any case of you turn it off its a non-issue, tad of rudder, and your up.

Regards.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #46 on: March 28, 2008, 12:35:03 PM »
No, like stall limiter, its a sign your a vet, right? ;)

In any case of you turn it off its a non-issue, tad of rudder, and your up.

Regards.

It's a non-issue if it's on...well, at least to most people except for those "special" few.


ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #47 on: March 28, 2008, 12:41:30 PM »
Beginning with the P-39N, the Airacobra had 1,420 hp on tap.

Isn't that the unofficial, field-boosted level? Standard factory levels were around 1200+


Since when does HTC model in over-boosted engines in this game?   :furious

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #48 on: March 28, 2008, 03:40:41 PM »
Isn't that the unofficial, field-boosted level? Standard factory levels were around 1200+


Since when does HTC model in over-boosted engines in this game?   :furious

Boy would you wine about the 1590 hp at 2.5k model. ;) This would be the D-2, k and L.

Edit: AHT. pg 191, table 25, P-39N/Q..... V-1710-85  wep= 1420 at 9.7k.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2008, 03:47:59 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #49 on: March 28, 2008, 03:50:18 PM »
Well AHT has been inaccurate according to some of you folks on other issues. Also that may be field-modified (as per my post).

I did a search on 2 dozen webpages with google to refresh my memory before posting. All of them list the P-39Q as having 1200hp. I thought it was 1200-something, maybe 1300 tops, but I was kinda surprised that every resource in a random web sampling all had the same levels. Even museums and military webpages listed 1200 for the Q and N (which was what the Q was modified from)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #50 on: March 28, 2008, 03:52:19 PM »
Well AHT has been inaccurate according to some of you folks on other issues. Also that may be field-modified (as per my post).

I did a search on 2 dozen webpages with google to refresh my memory before posting. All of them list the P-39Q as having 1200hp. I thought it was 1200-something, maybe 1300 tops, but I was kinda surprised that every resource in a random web sampling all had the same levels. Even museums and military webpages listed 1200 for the Q and N (which was what the Q was modified from)

Take off is listed as 1200, just so you know.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2008, 03:57:41 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #51 on: March 28, 2008, 03:53:49 PM »
takeoff is usually similar to emergency, as in short-duration, max power.

EDIT: None of the pages I sampled said "takeoff" though

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #52 on: March 28, 2008, 03:59:15 PM »
takeoff is usually similar to emergency, as in short-duration, max power.

EDIT: None of the pages I sampled said "takeoff" though
Did a quick google myself. None of the pages listed take off, normal, mil or wep.
See Rule #4

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #53 on: March 28, 2008, 04:08:03 PM »
Krusty from zeno's.


See Rule #4

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #54 on: March 28, 2008, 04:21:55 PM »
Not sure which P39 you guys are using.  The ones I tried, well, I'd rather be in a P40.  A couple more weeks and we wont be seeing any P39s in the MA skies  :rofl

Unless you bish, you will probably be seeing one ME!
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #55 on: March 28, 2008, 05:10:27 PM »
Bronk: thanks.

Now my question is: Why is a small increase in MAP with no increase in RPM making such a giant leap in horsepower? Also, is this a field-mod, as we hear many tales of the Soviets over-boosting their engines, swapping them out with little regard of maintaining them, etc?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #56 on: March 28, 2008, 05:39:54 PM »
I had to look for it.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,230639.0.html

The E6B doesn't even reach these boost levels.

It also has this problem on the P-40E. We can compare the P-40E and see that its power and speed curves are inconsistent for BOTH the P-40K and the P-40E. It is a hybrid, sort of like our typhoon has been described.

This makes me think the P-39s are also not spot-on, if the E6B and the actual boost don't match up.

We have standard boost P51s, P47s, P38s, I'd like to see a standard P39, personally. That's just me.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #57 on: March 28, 2008, 06:29:00 PM »
I had to look for it.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,230639.0.html

The E6B doesn't even reach these boost levels.

It also has this problem on the P-40E. We can compare the P-40E and see that its power and speed curves are inconsistent for BOTH the P-40K and the P-40E. It is a hybrid, sort of like our typhoon has been described.

This makes me think the P-39s are also not spot-on, if the E6B and the actual boost don't match up.

We have standard boost P51s, P47s, P38s, I'd like to see a standard P39, personally. That's just me.

Krusty I won't speak on the P-40, I will on the 39Q.  The max speed and and climb is about as I expected. I'm thinking the M.A.P indicator is just off. I'm willing to bet HT fixes the indicator and performance will remain the same.

I also could be wrong, time will tell.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2008, 06:39:16 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #58 on: March 28, 2008, 06:31:32 PM »
Bronk: thanks.

Now my question is: Why is a small increase in MAP with no increase in RPM making such a giant leap in horsepower? Also, is this a field-mod, as we hear many tales of the Soviets over-boosting their engines, swapping them out with little regard of maintaining them, etc?

Tell ya what jump in a stock 08 mustang. Now jump in one with a turbo producing as little as 4lbs of boost.
See Rule #4

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Impressions of the 39
« Reply #59 on: March 28, 2008, 06:34:58 PM »
Im sure the manifold guage is just off, thats all. New version, there are always a bunch of bugs, we will just have to wait for patch 3. 
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24