Author Topic: P38 maneuverability data  (Read 2092 times)

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
P38 maneuverability data
« on: January 21, 2001, 11:30:00 AM »
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum9/HTML/001363.html

scroll down through the uninformative stuff till you get to badboy's info on the real P-38 vs AH P-38.

very interesting  

[This message has been edited by Citabria (edited 01-21-2001).]
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2001, 11:39:00 AM »
Yawn

 

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2001, 12:09:00 PM »
To bad no reactions from HTC yet  

Offline Jimdandy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2001, 12:26:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by BUG_EAF322:
To bad no reactions from HTC yet  

Does the HT staff read all of these posts?


Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2001, 01:49:00 PM »
Yes Jim, I can assure you that most if not all the people at HTC read the boards religiously.

They will respond if they feel it is necessary or waranted.

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure

GunfighterIII

  • Guest
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2001, 03:04:00 PM »

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2001, 03:26:00 PM »
Interesting read Gunfighter.

Would you imagine how the P-38 would have performed with Merlin XX engines?

------------------
Fat DRUNK Bastards.

Nothing feels sweeter than facing a powerful enemy 1 on 1, the battle is tough, but you emerge victorious. As he types <S>!!! on channel one, you open fire on his chute.

Offline easymo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2001, 03:44:00 PM »
 Perk it.

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2001, 03:46:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Animal:
Interesting read Gunfighter.

Would you imagine how the P-38 would have performed with Merlin XX engines?



More or less like the Fw190 adapted with DB603 engine (Ta152-C)...in late 1943

Or a Fw190D9...in 1942  

GunfighterIII

  • Guest
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2001, 03:59:00 PM »
Im not quite sure of all the discrepancies involved in the AH version of the 38.  I don't fly it much personlly, seeing as I am a luftwaffe type. But I did take it up once and proceeded to get an engine shot out.  Now being a pilot myself, I expected the need to correct with rudder to counter the thrust produced by the good engine and the increased drag of the dead one.  But to my amazement, I didn't, she flew straight and level with one engine spinning wide open and the other just along for the ride.  I did notice that under 120 IAS did I need to start correcting for the lack of the engine, but even then it didn't take much.

GFIII
aka
Otto von Gunn

Offline BBGunn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2001, 05:20:00 PM »
Quite a discussion to say the least. One observation that seemed to be overlooked in the other thread is that if it weren't for the P38 the Pacific war would have lasted much longer.  It is a fact that P38's were used to shoot down more Japanese AC than any other type, so calling it a "piece of crap" is pure hyperbole".  All AC go through developmental stages and the P38's was initially very long because a certain B. Kelsey crashed the only XP-38 in existence so that the program had to start over again.  Also consider the fact that the P38 was originally intended to be an interceptor to defend the US against enemy bomber raids.  It was not really intended to be a fighter vs fighter ship but it exceeded its design specs in speed and got attention quickly.  Since the 38 was designed and tested mostly in sunny California not all the cold weather bugs surfaced until it got used in europe.  I have a personal acquaintence who served as a mechanic in the PTO and always said that "we were dammed lucky to get the Lockheed and get rid of those Bell aircows" (P39's) as he called them.  Also remember what P38 pilots did to axis air transport in the mediteranean.  P38's escorted the Japanese officials to the surrender ceremony at IoShima and may have been the first allied AC to set down on the Japanese mainland as well.  Also remember that the military bureaucracy works (yes sometimes it even works) in strange ways and that the military training program for the P38 was not what either Milo Burcham or Tony LeVier at Lockheed recommended.  This is one reason why Charles Lindburg went to the Pacific to fly P38's and F4U's-he new the military manuals were screwed up.  As for the P38 in AH it could probably could use some tweeking when flying on one engine and the fowler flaps should create more lift probably, but its still fun to fly.

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2001, 05:26:00 PM »
in a nation of people with two eyes, a man with one eye is half blind

In an ation of people with no eyes, that same man would be god.

You simply cant take the figures of a plane that mostly fighted Zekes ,Nates, and Oscars with the occasional Tojo,tony and in the latest days, Shiden-Kais and Ki-84s, with those who fought a TO with Fw190As ,190D9s, 109Gs, etc.



[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 01-21-2001).]

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2001, 08:07:00 PM »
Nice ram  

------------------
Baron Claus "StSanta" Von Ribbentroppen
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"

"We are the light at the end of your sorry little tunnel." - A. Eldritch

Offline Jigster

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
      • http://www.33rd.org
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2001, 08:16:00 PM »
Just a note, the cold weather of Europe effecting the P-38 is a just a myth. Altitude, yes, weather, no.

------------------
   
33rd FW www.33rd.org


Offline Dune

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
      • http://www.352ndfightergroup.com/
P38 maneuverability data
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2001, 08:25:00 PM »
AAhhh....yes.  The famous, "The P-38 only excelled against Zekes and Ki 43's.  It totally sucked against the LW".

Everyone who says this seems to forget that 3 FG's flew them in the MTO against units (and sub-units of) such as JG 27, JG 51, JG 53 and JG 77.  And they flew against them beginning in 43.

Groups like the 1st FG, 14th FG and the 82nd FG more than held their own. The 1st FG (operational Nov 42) scored 440 kills and had 19 aces. The 14th FG (oper. Nov 42) had 17 aces. The 82nd FG (oper. Jan 43) scored 594 kills and had 24 aces in its ranks. In fact the 82nd FG held the ETO/MTO record for kills until early 45.  These 3 FG's continued to fly the -38 until the end of the war.


------------------
Col Dune
C.O. 352nd Fighter Group
"The Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney"

"Credo quia absurdum est." (I believe it because it is unreasonable)
- The motto of the Republic of Baja Arizona