Author Topic: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?  (Read 867 times)

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2008, 09:57:43 AM »
Its tough to say if you are more deficient in intellect or class. 

Are you picking on the zinc member? beeing a gold memeber you should know to let zinc members get away with stuff

Offline Carwash

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2008, 09:58:32 AM »

In short, vehicles are obviously FUBAR, to some degree with damage modeling and majorly with collision modeling.

Its probably true that in ACES HIGH, the developers put more time into flight modeling than ground traffic modeling.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2008, 09:58:58 AM »
Armor of a wirbelwind side is 16mm thick . you probably will have some trouble penetrating that with a .50 since you dont normally have 90 degree angle to the armor.
If you penetrate the round itself  will not wobble around like a maniac. scrapnels that could penetrate and incapacitating its crew should limited.
penetration:

 "TM 9-1305-201-20&P: M2 AP
Used by M2 and M85 machine guns. The cartridge is for use against light-armored or unarmored targets, concrete shelters, and similar bullet-resisting targets."

Armor Penetration.
500 meters: 0.75 in (19 mm)
1,200 meters: 0.39 in (10 mm)










Is that data taken from modern rounds or from ww2 ammo?

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2008, 10:03:04 AM »
It's pretty weak.  A handful of bullets on target, or an M8 round in the turret are enough to disable it. 

I can attest to this as one of my favorite passtimes is cruising around in an M8 and popping peoples turrets. then driving away.  :D
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2008, 10:10:20 AM »
Is that data taken from modern rounds or from ww2 ammo?

They are pretty much the same.

Also, the tops of both the osti and WW are open so there is no armor at all at high angles of attack.

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2008, 05:29:33 AM »
I have ran up on a wirbel with a jeep and disabled many of thier turrets. Once there were about five wirbels doing a great job of working together heading for our town. I watched as many planes died as they went afver them. I then rolled a Jeep and zoomed through thier little formation and took out three turrets before being sent to the tower. Try it out in the DA if you want.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2008, 06:58:00 AM »
Normally at combat ranges you will have trouble killing a wirbelwind/ostwind  due to the fact that dispersion of wingmounted guns should give limited hits on a small target itself ( wirbelwind turret).
Dispersion is weak in AH2 and you can both hit and penetrate armor of even a MBT- something that should be fixed imo.

My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6456
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2008, 08:25:50 AM »
I can't tell any difference. However, is the view suppose to be so obstructed in the osty? Another thing, I can turn off the tracers in the WW but not the Osty. Is that suppose to be that way?


  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline ShrkBite

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2008, 09:24:46 AM »
LMAO! This thread reminds me of yesturday i turreted a WW with just my Pistol. HAHAHA TOO FUNNY!

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2008, 09:42:31 AM »
Its probably true that in ACES HIGH, the developers put more time into flight modeling than ground traffic modeling.

Whats your point?

Offline 442w30

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 471
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2008, 10:24:19 AM »
I have ran up on a wirbel with a jeep and disabled many of thier turrets. Once there were about five wirbels doing a great job of working together heading for our town. I watched as many planes died as they went afver them. I then rolled a Jeep and zoomed through thier little formation and took out three turrets before being sent to the tower. Try it out in the DA if you want.

That said, you are an exceptional GVer and the normal Gver probably wouldn't be able to get away with that. Me for instance!  :) 

I like to up flaks and have gone back to the Osti since the last patch because I think it gets turreted less often.  I got real sick of getting one or two pings in a WW and being out of action. 
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time

"The plural of anecdote is no data."- statistician's axiom

Offline VansCrew1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2377
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2008, 11:08:50 AM »
I popped a WW turret with my .45 today. Just go's to show how weak it is.
Tour 79
Callsign: VansCrew


"The Ringer"

Offline mensa180

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4010
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2008, 11:28:14 AM »
I definitely don't have the best aim, but I can kill them just fine with the 50s in a 38.  No super long bursts needed, just don't miss, because you won't be able to (for the most part) make another pass.
inactive
80th FS "Headhunters"
Public Relations Officer

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2008, 01:48:39 PM »
Some guys just don't think things thru.  The crew in the open GVs have the same DM as the gunners/pilots in planes...  I straffed a bunch of WWs today, with 50 cals.. You can walk the bullets to the turret and trash it with just a few hits.  They're no harder to damage than field guns.
6x50cal x 100 rounds or so + 500 extra ft/s + human body = ? 
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Tr1gg22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 871
Re: WhirbleWind less vulnerable than the Osti?
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2008, 05:59:17 PM »
Are you picking on the zinc member? beeing a gold memeber you should know to let zinc members get away with stuff
   :lol ive been around for 2+ years just never registered
"CO" of the Wobblin Gobblins...