most of the 109s I saw were G2s or G6s, which is historically accurate.
I understand the need to put certain models in as subs. Such as a FW-190A5 for a FW-190A1, or a F6F5 instead of an F6F3.
However there is no need to put the 109 F in this setup. You guys removed all other aircraft of questionable participation.
If you're going to do it for one you should do it for all.
When you have the correct plane available you should put it in a setup, not pull it because you think to many people will fly it, or it's too good.
When you have a plane that is questionable for the setup you should NOT include because you want people to fly it as you're doing with the F.
No Spits, no Tigers, and I removed both the FM2 and the Hurri IIC. Would also have taken away the 109F, but thought it was a good intro for people who haven't flown 109s much
Guys I'd just like to humbly point out you have elements of at least three different Jagdgeschwaders operating in the AVA now.
They're skilled and experianced enough that you do not need to hold their hand.
As far as people who havent flown 109s much.. They won't fly it here either, and you shouldn't be worried about introducing the 109 to players in the AVA. The 109 is in almost every AVA setup. If a guy flys in the AVA and has never flown a 109... Adding the F model to a setup where it should not be isnt going to suddenly change that.
What I would like to see is setups with aircaft historically matched as much as possible. For accuracy no models pulled because one side or the other doesn't like the plane. If it was there in the war it should be there in the setup.
I'd like to see you guys not try and influence game play by getting artsy with the plane set. Give us what the sides had historically when it's avilable, and let us go at it.
Thanks Staff <S>
