Author Topic: German fighters......  (Read 1773 times)

Offline Lumpy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2008, 10:06:44 AM »
Only way they could keep up with allied production (well ... they still couldn't keep up). One of the great benefits of the 109 was that it was cheap and producible. Some people like to see the 109 as an example of superior German engineering, but in reality it was a flying VolksWagen. With slave labour the Germans could make about ten 109's for the price of one P-51D (1940 currency conversion). The 109G series reflects this the most with numerous simplifications in production over the F model. Many of which compromised performance like the fixed tail wheel, removal of radiator boundary layer bypass ducts, the use of heavier wood rather than aluminium in some parts (like the tail) etc.
“I’m an angel. I kill first borns while their mommas watch. I turn cities into salt. I even – when I feel like it – rip the souls from little girls and now until kingdom come the only thing you can count on, in your existence, is never ever understanding why.”

-Archangel Gabriel, The P

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2008, 12:55:51 PM »
Someone's been watching too much History Channel.... :rofl

I can't believe that no one has mentioned pilot skill.  By 1943 many of Germany's core pilots had been lost.  By 1944, about the time that the improved allied fighters like the P-47D and P-51D came into service, most of Germany's core pilots were dead.  Allied pilots in aircraft like the P-47D and P-51D had the great opportunity to club a bunch of new, inexperienced pilots who didn't have a clue as to what they were doing.  Yes, there were exceptions, but to attribute the allied air victory to aircraft quality over pilot skill is wrong (numerical superiority is worth mentioning too, they didn't have ENY).
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 01:14:44 PM by Anaxogoras »
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline BnZ

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #17 on: April 27, 2008, 01:00:09 PM »

If the needs changed, then there would have been more development but in Germany's case in particular, the ME's were able to evolve to fit the need and the production facilities were already in place.  There are considerable differences between the 109E-4 and the 109K-4 (or the 163 or 262).  They aren't even close to the same plane.  A true tribute to Willy Messerschmitt's design genious.

I always thought the genius of the 109 was the fact they stuck as much horsepower as available in the airframe...even a brick with enough thrust is no longer a brick, its a hot fighter. Love those German engines...but imagine what you would get it if you put a Jumo 213's horsepower in a P-51! That, and maybe the slats are a fairly clever alternative to the Spit's wing-tip washout for less dangerous stalls. Am I missing something else?


Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #18 on: April 27, 2008, 01:11:53 PM »
Oh yeah, one more thing that's no modeled in AH:  Fuel-injection vs. carburators (not talking about Spit/Hurri1) / prop pitch and mixture controls...  If these engine components were modeled the engineering of German aircraft would really shine compared to their allied counterparts.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #19 on: April 27, 2008, 01:52:43 PM »
Oh yeah, one more thing that's no modeled in AH:  Fuel-injection vs. carburators (not talking about Spit/Hurri1) / prop pitch and mixture controls...  If these engine components were modeled the engineering of German aircraft would really shine compared to their allied counterparts.
Yep. This is the only thing I envy about Il2 (the game).

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #20 on: April 27, 2008, 04:22:47 PM »
On the other hand, most test pilot records I've read indicate that the automated engine controls, while much simpler to operate, took a lot of control away from the pilot.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #21 on: April 27, 2008, 04:58:17 PM »
Focke-Wulf Fw 187
Focke-Wulf Ta 154


The Ta 154 never even got past the prototype stage.
The Fw 187 never saw combat
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grnherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Lumpy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #22 on: April 27, 2008, 05:25:33 PM »
The Luftwaffe pilot cadre did not suffer critical losses in 1943. It was during the spring of 1944 that they suffered catastrophic losses. Actually the Luftwaffe won significant victories against the 8th Army Air Force in 1943.
“I’m an angel. I kill first borns while their mommas watch. I turn cities into salt. I even – when I feel like it – rip the souls from little girls and now until kingdom come the only thing you can count on, in your existence, is never ever understanding why.”

-Archangel Gabriel, The P

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2008, 11:40:45 AM »
Sort of thought that they bled the whole time with some bad months, and then they almost collapsed, seperating the heard from greenhorn to experts with very little between...in 1943/44..
my cents.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #24 on: April 29, 2008, 01:01:51 PM »

The Ta 154 never even got past the prototype stage.
The Fw 187 never saw combat

The Ta 154 got past the prototype stage. Even the serial production was started but they soon found out the replacement glue they were forced to use (the original manufacturer was bombed-out) was not as strong as the original one and it quickly corroded the wood so the whole project had to be canned.

The Fw 187 did saw combat - they were used to defend the Focke-Wulf factory in Bremen during the initial phase of WWII in 1939 and 1940. Rumors they had some victories were not confirmed.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #25 on: April 29, 2008, 07:18:58 PM »
Some people like to see the 109 as an example of superior German engineering, but in reality it was a flying VolksWagen.

Although it pains me to admit it being a 109 freak... I agree.  :(

I dont remember where, exactly, but I read an article a few months back written by a guy who flew in a then newly restored bird (think it was a G6) for the first time.  Just about every word of the "review" was great - awesome descriptions of the smallest details and what it was like to fly, etc, etc but he kept on hinting at its build quality indirectly - more than once mentioning how shocked he was by how much the A/C seemed to shake, rattle and squeak all around him, as though it were a sum of parts rather than a single, forged tool.

Now, I suppose its difficult to draw a truly accurate assessment because the A/C was originally built 60+ years ago in the first place and, secondly, the quality of the restoration is unknown. 

Be that as it may, the build quality of the 109 vs. the 190 is fairly well documented by the pilots who flew them, again in an slightly indirect sense.  IIRC, Gunther Rall was particularly outspoken, in post-war interviews, in favor of the 190 for several reasons, most of them aggregating to what we think of today (or at least, 10-20 years ago, in the automotive sense) as "German engineering."  The single piece wing of the 190 was probably one of the most significant factors in these assessments as any perceived lack of structural rigidity in the 109 would only be pronounced by the two-piece wing design.

Arguments for both cases, I suppose.  Hell, Ive read/seen plenty of Allied pilot interviews where Jug drivers who were forced to convert to the 51 late in the war couldn't say a single positive thing about the Mustang and long for their 47 the whole time.  Each to his own.  I guess when youre getting shot at with real bullets, strength and survivability take priority over an extra 5MPH.

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2008, 05:01:06 AM »
"On the other hand, most test pilot records I've read indicate that the automated engine controls, while much simpler to operate, took a lot of control away from the pilot."

Sure, and I have heard that many American pilots did not how to adjust their engine properly resulting in poor fuel economy (and what else). I wonder if some of those guys were the same who commented over the lack of control over engine settings in German rides?   :P

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline DPQ5

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: German fighters......
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2008, 06:49:30 PM »
Yes i'm a good tank, but that statement was true, they designed bigger, badder tanks that they really couldn't produce. German numbers for production stayed the same throughout the war until the Ruhr was taken but the bomber offensive was i hate to say but more of a waste of lives and planes. German plane production was never really halted because of the ingenious way they built the planes. Instead of one big building, were the y produced everything, it went from one place to another so production would only slow never stop. Bak to the tanks tho, the Stug III and the IV were good tanks, not in the standard of the hetzer but good tanks.  Now the hetzer should have been one they produced earlier and with more numbers. It was a great tank, strong, accurate, and reliable.

well the bombing was alse to demorilize the enemy, wich it did. The production rate did decrease
and about the tanks, well I herd the russians got so deperate to kill the tiger that they would ram them. So are you sure about the better tank things. Well also the sherman was fairly good in combat aginst the stug and panzer 4. It was the tigers and panthers that gave em a run for there money
29th Infantry Division
Darkest Hour Realism Unit
King Company
Sgt. Phillips