Author Topic: 109 landing  (Read 819 times)

Offline Papabear

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
109 landing
« on: June 04, 2008, 05:30:38 PM »
Even when it's done right... It can go wrong.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a46_1211965193
Papabear, CO of “Ewes guys” A non-profit, non-sexist, lighthearted group of well wishers diligently dedicated to the preservation of the reputation of the lovely sheep of Aces High.  We are, "The guardians of the flock".

[img]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7633/sheep1xg5.jpg[/i

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2008, 04:25:28 AM »
Very professional pilot. He knew that the gear had failed to lock down and tried to bring the plane down as slow as possible to keep damages to minimum. AFAIK there was only small damage so the plane will fly again after small repairs.

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2008, 10:51:54 AM »
looked like that. a very fine job.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline VooWho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1214
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2008, 08:35:56 AM »
To bad he got a ditch and didn't land his kills.


Nice landing and great skills to bring that bird back safely.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae!

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2008, 02:28:39 PM »
That was very interesting. I wonder what was going through his mind as the wheels touched.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2008, 02:35:07 PM »
The 109's landing gear we're notorious for not locking. I recall, I think it was Gunther Rall, or maybe it was Galland, saying that they'd do some sort of maneuver before landing to make sure the gear locked.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2008, 05:44:15 PM »
AFAIK there was only small damage so the plane will fly again after small repairs.

-C+


I nearly had a heart attack when I thought we lost another 109. Thank god the pilot made it, and THANK GOD the plane will fly again.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2008, 06:51:53 PM »
The 109's landing gear we're notorious for not locking. I recall, I think it was Gunther Rall, or maybe it was Galland, saying that they'd do some sort of maneuver before landing to make sure the gear locked.

Good point. I'll ask...Rall ;)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline AquaShrimp

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1706
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2008, 08:49:07 PM »
Did I read somewhere that fully 1/3rd of all 109s were lost in accidents?

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2008, 09:22:35 PM »
Did I read somewhere that fully 1/3rd of all 109s were lost in accidents?

IIRC, that was determined to be a HIGHLY exagerated number. A lot of aircraft were damaged in accidents, due to things like this gear issue, and their terrible ground-handling, but it wasn't THAT bad of an issue.

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2008, 11:57:09 PM »
Did I read somewhere that fully 1/3rd of all 109s were lost in accidents?

I don't know.  Did you?

I'd question that along with the majority of your other sources.

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2008, 06:38:52 AM »
<S> to that pilot for keeping such a nice bird under control in tricky circumstances. That must have been hell for him. That just proves what an old BoB veteren said. He asked a german pilot after the war 'Do you know why Britain won the Battle of Britain?' and the german replied no. 'Because any idiot can fly a Spitfire or Hurricane, but it takes a lot of practice to fly a 109.'
Even with a lot of practice, accidents like that could still happen. <S>
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: 109 landing
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2008, 04:01:13 PM »
<S> to that pilot for keeping such a nice bird under control in tricky circumstances. That must have been hell for him. That just proves what an old BoB veteren said. He asked a german pilot after the war 'Do you know why Britain won the Battle of Britain?' and the german replied no. 'Because any idiot can fly a Spitfire or Hurricane, but it takes a lot of practice to fly a 109.'
Even with a lot of practice, accidents like that could still happen. <S>

I remember watching an interview, I believe with that same pilot, where he said everytime he walks away from flying a Bf-109, he looks back and says "You didn't get me this time!". She still didn't get him!