Author Topic: Its not a HO after the inital merge..  (Read 1398 times)

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2008, 12:06:19 AM »
When I'm in the 190F-8 and already engaged with a bandit (and maybe still carrying ords for gv's below me), I HO on any second bandit that comes into the picture.  Well, maybe I wouldn't do it against a Typhy, but it sure worked well against an LA-7 the other night.

Bottom line is, when faced with a faster, superior maneuvering aircraft, the head-on is de rigueur.
I don't think he's talking about multiple opponents.

What I'm saying is that if a shot is taken here-

It's a cheap HO.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2008, 12:11:30 AM by Motherland »

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2008, 12:15:04 AM »
Did you see my edit?
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2008, 12:17:56 AM »
Yeah...
I think my second post explains what I'm trying to say better though.

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2008, 12:22:16 AM »
long story short I came face to face with a guy in scissors and shot him as he passed under me head on..

abusive PMs till squelch.
The generally accepted difference in AH between a "front quarter shot" and what is refered to with distain as a HO, is that a HO requires a show of mutual gun solutions.  If you were in opposing circles, and he passed under you, then he likely wouldn't have had guns.  You had guns, he didn't, case dismissed  :)
« Last Edit: July 11, 2008, 12:27:39 AM by Murdr »

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2008, 12:26:09 AM »
If you're face to face after the initial merge you both did something wrong and you should not take the shot.
Oh, and shooting someone after the immelman that usually follows the initial merge is just as bad.

Just a side note.  If I'm the bogie, and you take your nose off of me for too early of a pre-turn, and you're sloppy with your positioning, expect to be shot.  That's not a cheap shot, that's letting you know you're "avoiding the HO" incorrectly  ;)

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2008, 12:29:02 AM »
Yeah...
I think my second post explains what I'm trying to say better though.

Not fair.  You have that great graphic. :P
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2008, 12:33:07 AM »
Wingnuts right, some guys will complain about anything, especialy a long fight that degenerates into a face off at low alt, somtimes it just went that way, so stop the whining, <------------good thread wingnut, dont take no guff off the guys in here, they just want to belittle you in front of the other kiddies in here so the 200 daily whine can go on unabated....keep a stiff upper lip brother.

<S> ROOKS best HO mongers of all lol.
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2008, 12:35:27 AM »
Not fair.  You have that great graphic. :P
Hey- I made it :P

Offline SPKmes

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3271
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2008, 12:39:22 AM »
so your going to spawn camp?  :noid

you'll have to camp yourself to find out....I see you I kill you  :D

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2008, 12:49:53 AM »
IMO anything goes after the opening merge.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Fulmar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
      • Aces High Movie Database
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2008, 12:59:50 AM »
Man, I can't believe how dead this horse is.  You'd think after all these years there would be nothing left to beat...

This is the same thread as last week, last month, last year.  Let's move on for $#%!'s sake
In game callsign: not currently flying
Flying off and on since Warbirds
Aces High Movies available at www.derstuhl.net/ahmd2 - no longer aceshighmovies.com - not updated either

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2008, 01:05:02 AM »
Wingnuts right, some guys will complain about anything, especialy a long fight that degenerates into a face off at low alt, somtimes it just went that way, so stop the whining, <------------good thread wingnut, dont take no guff off the guys in here, they just want to belittle you in front of the other kiddies in here so the 200 daily whine can go on unabated....keep a stiff upper lip brother.

Not picking on you, but this quote reminded me of something.  Not too long ago, I had 2 spits on a rope throwing tracers in my general direction, and I see a third bogie getting ready to pick me.  I evaded, he loops over and I turn back into him.  I had the drop on him.  Gunsight on him d800+ and he hadn't completed his reverse yet.  I knew who the bogie was, and he knew who I was.  We both approached each other from d600 nose on till point blank range, with a slow closure rate.  He waited until the last possible split second and pulled a sucker punch of a HO.  It was so last second the hits didn't even register until we had passed the merge.  He of course heard my opinion about it when my hands were free to type.  

At this point, enter the know nothing dork, who presumes to enlighten me about Head-ons.  Well as evidenced by the numerous, perhaps hundreds of threads on this topic, there are quite a bit of hairsplittings and caviots on what's a "cheap HO" and what isn't.  So really a third party has no first hand knowledge about an alleged incident, and is incapible of adding anything of value to the conversation.  Where was I going with this?  Oh, yea... Shuddup and mind you own freakin business in the peanut gallery :)
« Last Edit: July 11, 2008, 01:13:36 AM by Murdr »

Offline kj714

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 874
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2008, 03:37:22 AM »
Alot of the time in the MA I find guys who are pulling hard into the remerge and getting popped in the canopy and then complaining about a "HO".


+1!

So many just can't get off the wep, chop throttle and hit flaps if they have 'em. They just race around the outside and complain when you nail em as they cross your path the second time.

Offline SD67

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3218
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2008, 04:15:49 AM »
Yeah, I mean, after the first time, it's like you're buddies and all ;)
A Ho is just a friend you haven't "merged with" yet. :lol
9GIAP VVS RKKA
You're under arrest for violation of the Government knows best act!
Fabricati diem, punc
Absinthe makes the Tart grow fonder

Offline hammer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
      • netAces
Re: Its not a HO after the inital merge..
« Reply #29 on: July 11, 2008, 07:26:30 AM »
...Planes are free...

Planes are free?!?  BOOZER!!!!!! Give me my money back!!!!!
Hammer

JG11
(Temporarily Retired)