Lol funked! Short and sweet.. I like that

The only reason I said the alt thing is because the great majority of those airplanes were used at their best alts.. a P-38 would never go below 10k, it was near suicide to do so unless you were on a ground attack mission. It was one of the golden rules of all P-38 aces and something that was hammered into the new Lightning pilots.
The Typhoon im sure never saw a dogfight at 28k, and im sure that other planes in the saw action at the alts at which they behaved best. So nearly all literature we get from such planes/pilots all praise THOSE characteristics. Yet in AH, there are no massive bomber formations to escort (unless the rare mission comes up), no arranged flights or any of that sort. You basically take off in a plane, head to your destination and grab alt in the way. Why dont all pilots just climb to their best alt and fight there? Because its boring, time consuming, you are likely to not find the fight up there but down on the deck or at 12k and those pilots fighting down there are gorged in a slug fest that no real pilot in his sane mind wouldve engaged in during the war. That makes the qualities that made those planes BE on AH in the first place go completely to waste, as they do not perform in COMBAT in the same way as they did in real life..because in real life a P38 would not dive from 28k to 5k just to wipe out a zeke or two, nor did a P-47 or 109 do it... its just dumb to do that.
Am I making any sense here?
I'm always for practical demonstrations, not just talk and speculation. Try the "best performance at any alt" for a week, there is nothing to lose from trying it and certainly LOTS to gain...like, knowing if it is or is not better for gameplay and the mere fact that it was TRIED, not talked and flamed to death like most discussions here do. I have no idea if this would be hard/strenous for Pyro & Crew to try in the code or if the community is open/close minded to try it or not try it. I merely give an idea freely, its up to you if you want to use it or not.
[This message has been edited by Tac (edited 08-22-2000).]