If i did HO, i would still need to go nose on - all i am doing is moving the forward view up and moving the mousepointer where the gunsight would be so i can see where i am shooting.
No, A8Tool has a point. N1K's land more lucky HO shots on me than other aircraft for the exact reason that a lot of the good sticks are using the rigged forward view for near-180-degree deflection shots. Normal HO-avoidance tactics just don't work as well against an aircraft that can see you when all others would be shooting blind over their cowl. To be specific, these shots are from very close range and on the aft section of my aircraft. Now, I don't have a problem with someone raising their view over the normal gunsight view, but using the mouse as an aiming point is another matter. Think about it. While you could easily put a dot on your computer monitor to have the same effect, the same would not work in a real aircraft. You could not put a dot on the canopy of an aircraft and, voila, just like that, have a second gunsight. It might provide you with some frame of reference, but it would be a crude instrument, and would not match the effectiveness of a real gunsight the way the mouse does in AH.
In the meantime, I am learning to avoid N1K HO's differently than others. It requires a different technique, no doubt, but it ought not to be possible to rig a second gunsight like that. An easy fix would be for the mouse to vanish after you press "h" or leave it in place for 10 seconds.