They're both in DC because Bush asked them to come.
What's the big deal with a resked on the debate? Slide it for a week or two or whatever. It's not like it would be anything you haven't heard before. It'll be the SOS we've been hearing for nearly two years and what you heard during the party debates.
The real problem is the bailout bill. Screw the talk, let's see some LEADERSHIP. They both say they have it, time to flaunt it on the national stage. Guy that doesn't screw the taxpayer in this deal wins.
Should be simple for two such accomplished leaders, right?
Ron Paul has more leadership than the two of them put together. He called this shot, told everyone we were headed this way.
His latest comments are here:
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/the-home-front/2008/09/19/ron-paul-this-bailout-wont-be-the-last.htmlWhat's your take on this huge financial bailout?
"It's more of the same. More debt and more inflation and more pressure on the dollar. Ultimately, although the markets are responding very favorably at the moment, I think it is going to be devastating to the dollar and to our financial situation in this country."
But don't we need to get these toxic assets off banks' balance sheets?
"Sure, they need to be removed. Somebody needs to suffer the consequences [but] not the taxpayer. Everybody knows that they have to be removed. They are priced too high. The assets don't have real value—some have zero and some have 10 cents on the dollar.
The people who had been making profits for all these years and dealing in all of this debt creation and derivatives—that now is becoming unwound—are claiming that it would be so painful if somebody went bankrupt and therefore we have to put so much burden on the taxpayer and on the dollar because the alternative is worse. But quite frankly, if they destroy the dollar and the dollar system, then they have a much bigger problem that they are going to have to deal with and it would be the collapse of the whole international monetary system—which is conceivable."