Author Topic: Bf-109G2 of JG11  (Read 645 times)

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Bf-109G2 of JG11
« on: October 02, 2008, 11:01:12 AM »




Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4229
Re: Bf-109G2 of JG11
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2008, 11:11:26 AM »
Nice!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Bf-109G2 of JG11
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2008, 11:27:48 AM »
I'd suggest easing up on the ailerons and elevator shadows a bit, and adding a hint of them on the rudder.

Unless the controls were shredded you wouldn't see too much. Maybe more of a gentle shadow. I put some light details on mine because folks expected it, but I wanted to do no detail on the ailerons more than once.

Examples:

http://bp0.blogger.com/_CbwnjooteyI/SEgb9VAptwI/AAAAAAAAPMg/Sif1lxPMjCo/s1600-h/ME_109_ENGINE_DETAIL.jpg



http://bp0.blogger.com/_CbwnjooteyI/SEgbpVAptrI/AAAAAAAAPL4/_GpGHRJWBcw/s1600-h/me_109_2.jpg

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Re: Bf-109G2 of JG11
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2008, 04:55:46 PM »
I really like your 109s Fencer - you're doing a great job adding lots of variety.

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
Re: Bf-109G2 of JG11
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2008, 04:02:00 AM »
Nice work, Fencer.

I'd agree with Krusty on the control surface details, they're a bit OTT.

Also, the port wing camo, should it be curved (like near the wing cross) or should it just be the standard, straight-edged splinter camo?
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"