Author Topic: New style task group  (Read 743 times)

Offline Jappa52

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
Re: New style task group
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2008, 03:41:02 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Would this fix the problem?

oh wow, now that's something I would like to see!
ATTAQUEZET CONQUEREZ
8TH FIGHTER GROUP

Jappa52- 36th FIGHTER SQ Flying Fiends

Offline Selino631

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
Re: New style task group
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2008, 09:56:36 PM »
i think they should take out 1 destroyer in the TG and put a Coast Guard cutter in. they really did escort carriers and supply ships during the way and saw plenty of action. there is a ship, USCGC Taney docked in Baltimore, Maryland that is the only ship still afloat that saw action at Pearl Harbor. Also fought in Gualacanal and served as a flagship in Okinawa. I beleive the Taney origanaly carried 1 5" gun 6 50 caliber machine guns and 2 25mm cannons.




OEF 11-12

Offline **CLONE155**

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
Re: New style task group
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2008, 10:07:22 PM »
I think that if we do get Battle ship fleets, then they should not be able to launch any type of vehicle, that way it is less of a stratigic target if nothing can take off from it, so the suicidal attacks on it would be very pointless unless you are protecting a CV. and if you ARE protecting a CV, i hope you have kept your own battle ship close  :) if not, then start running! With this tactic, it will create a cool new naval strategy, and that would be "don't leave without the battleship!" Also, only about 2 of the 5" should be able to be manned, leave the rest auto.

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: New style task group
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2008, 11:01:42 PM »
In my opinion, it could work, but when the Task Group got into a dar circle, it started flashing. (only for battleship)
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: New style task group
« Reply #19 on: October 01, 2008, 11:18:57 PM »
Would this fix the problem?

No it would not because we already have dweebs that drop troops over CVs to distract the ack.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: New style task group
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2008, 12:16:03 PM »
And you're absolutely certain that the goons would make it over the TG to drop 10 troops? (Hint: The picture shows only half the force. I combined 5 TG's into one fleet.)
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15641
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: New style task group
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2008, 02:31:43 PM »
My view on TG's:
On Ozkansas, "ports" that are large airfields should get the whole package, 4x destroyers, 2x (add another one to it) crusiers, and 1x carrier
"ports" that are med/small should get 1x carrier, 2x destroyer, and 1x crusier
regular port ports, should get a battle package, consisting of 3x crusiers, and 1 or 2 destroyers. This evens out the load of the CV. Plus, if people were smart, they would "combine" the two (if they had a battle package) with a carrier so the ships with no CV could then be protected.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com