« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: We NEED the 109G10!  (Read 3443 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #45 on: October 05, 2008, 12:29:30 PM »
They could, or they could implement the perked ord system, which would allow certain loadouts to be controled.  But they seem to want to use very basic aircraft names and the perk loadout system remains unimplemented.

As to the Bf109F-4 with gondolas, I recall some pretty serious 109s fans showing that they didn't exist in reality.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #46 on: October 05, 2008, 12:52:16 PM »
That's interesting.  In the book 109 F, G, & K Series by Prien and Rodeike there are four photos of 109F-4's with 20mm gondolas from 1./JG52 and 3./JG52.

Quote from: Karnak on October 05, 2008, 12:29:30 PM
But they seem to want to use very basic aircraft names

Which is against the production philosophy of the wartime German aircraft industry. :P
« Last Edit: October 05, 2008, 12:53:53 PM by Anaxogoras »
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #47 on: October 05, 2008, 09:29:28 PM »
Quote from: Anaxogoras on October 05, 2008, 12:52:16 PM
That's interesting.  In the book 109 F, G, & K Series by Prien and Rodeike there are four photos of 109F-4's with 20mm gondolas from 1./JG52 and 3./JG52.
I could have remembered a bit wrong too, it may have been shown to be extremely rare.  You'd have to do searches on it, the discussions should still be around.

Quote
Which is against the production philosophy of the wartime German aircraft industry. :P
Doesn't work really well for many British aircraft either.

Spitfire Mk IXs:

Spitfire F.Mk IX (can have either Merlin 61 or Merlin 63, "universal wing" with two 20mm, four .303s and no bomb racks, centerline bomb rack, has full wings)
Spitfire LF.Mk IX (Merlin 66, "universal wing" with two 20mm, four .303s and no bomb racks, centerline bomb rack, may or may not have clipped wings)
Spitfire HF.Mk IX (Merlin 70, "universal wing" with two 20mm, four .303s and no bomb racks, centerline bomb rack, may or may not have clipped wings)
Spitfire LF.Mk IXe (Merlin 66, "e wing" with two 20mm, two .50s and racks for two bombs or two rockets, centerline rack, probably has clipped wings)
Spitfire HF.Mk IXe (Merlin 70, "e wing" with two 20mm, two .50s and racks for two bombs or two rockets, centerline rack, probably has full wings)
« Last Edit: October 05, 2008, 09:36:20 PM by Karnak »
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #48 on: October 05, 2008, 09:35:49 PM »
Quote from: SpikesX on October 04, 2008, 11:21:46 AM
LOL!Did I say that?

 I know you weren't.

glock will hold the record for being the first poster to reach 1k posts and not have any clue of what he is saying.
Logged
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #49 on: October 05, 2008, 09:37:42 PM »
Quote from: SuBWaYCH on October 05, 2008, 09:35:49 PM
glock will hold the record for being the first poster to reach 1k posts and not have any clue of what he is saying.
The serect is in the drink. :O
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Agent360

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
      • http://troywardphotography.com
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #50 on: October 05, 2008, 10:07:02 PM »
There were do many variants of all planes. The 109 series had so many varients. Some saw combat some were just sort of experiemental or saw combat becuase of urgency.

This happend with all planes for each country.

I think the best idea idea presented so far is an ordance perk system. I would gladly pay perks to have 20mm on the K4 or 30mm on the G2 or rockets or bombs for any 109. How about trading fuel or ammo for getting one or the other. If you want a bomb then you have to take less cannon or fuel....etc.

The same goes for any plane set.

Add to wish list!!
Logged

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #51 on: October 05, 2008, 10:12:22 PM »
Quote from: glock89 on October 05, 2008, 09:37:42 PM
The serect is in the drink. :O

keep going, your almost there.
Logged
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #52 on: October 05, 2008, 11:05:54 PM »
Quote from: SuBWaYCH on October 05, 2008, 10:12:22 PM
keep going, your almost there.
I will but i don't want 2 get ban. :(
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #53 on: October 05, 2008, 11:56:01 PM »

That's not up to you, it's up to the all powerful Skuzzy :)
Logged
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline BoSoxFan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #54 on: October 06, 2008, 12:53:19 AM »
Quote from: Iron_Cross on October 04, 2008, 08:38:15 PM
We have huge holes in the VVS, Italian, and Japanese planesets and you want another German plane.  Explain your logic, for it seems much more advanced than our own Earth logic. :rolleyes:


Its called CT. Since its going to be 8th AF vs. the LW we could use a better '43-'44 high altitude 109. 
Logged

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2008, 09:44:31 AM »
Quote from: BoSoxFan on October 06, 2008, 12:53:19 AM

Its called CT. Since its going to be 8th AF vs. the LW we could use a better '43-'44 high altitude 109. 

HERE HERE!!!!
Logged
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #56 on: October 06, 2008, 09:54:30 AM »
Quote from: BoSoxFan on October 06, 2008, 12:53:19 AM

Its called CT. Since its going to be 8th AF vs. the LW we could use a better '43-'44 high altitude 109. 

In that case a 109G-6/AS is what you're looking for. :aok
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!

Offline MjTalon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2587
      • 82nd FG Home
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #57 on: October 06, 2008, 10:06:50 AM »
Yea, I've been reading the posts and so far Glock is the only person posting who has no idea what he is saying or what's going on around him.


As far as the G10.. I wasn't around when it was available but I've read that it was basically a K model with a 20mm gun option. I'd say it should return since the K4 is kinda limited with it's 65 30mm Cannon rounds. But a experienced stick should have no problem taking down multiple bandits as long as he shoots in close and make sure the shots count.

I wouldn't mind the 109G10... as long as we get the P-47M... :)
Logged

S.A.P.P.
Cavalier - 82nd F.G
Group Commanding Officer

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #58 on: October 06, 2008, 10:19:19 AM »
Oh lordy, not again, Wrag!
Logged

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: We NEED the 109G10!
« Reply #59 on: October 06, 2008, 01:05:55 PM »
Quote from: Lukanian-7 on October 04, 2008, 08:04:46 PM
What I Mean Is That We Should Concentrate On More Aircraft Types Rather Than Variation Off Of Existing Ones

Consider Before You Go Insulting

I Dont Think He Is Directly Insulting You. 

I, On The Other Hand, Am.  :)

(Bring back the G10, kthxbye)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »