A20g Little Cheif 321st BS 675th BG?

[lyric1]

You would be right.

Link to another view of the nose of this plane. http://books.google.com/books?id=J48Z2-l7ugEC&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq=b25+texas+gal&source=web&ots=6zVOL7Wqo9&sig=-0EDc-Ve3Qby8gEwQPdQC3fCZt4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA173,M1

[lyric1]

Link to another view of the nose of this plane. http://books.google.com/books?id=J48Z2-l7ugEC&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq=b25+texas+gal&source=web&ots=6zVOL7Wqo9&sig=-0EDc-Ve3Qby8gEwQPdQC3fCZt4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA173,M1

1 more time.

[rogerdee]

well we got pictures of the plane and it had flew in combat in the past.

I wounder if HTC would accept it?

[lyric1]

well we got pictures of the plane and it had flew in combat in the past.

I wounder if HTC would accept it?

It would be interesting to allow planes like this.

[Greebo]

I think it would be worth getting the OK from HTC before doing too much work on it. They might think of it as too much of a one-off scheme, not representative of a frontline aircraft.

[Guppy35]

well we got pictures of the plane and it had flew in combat in the past.

I wounder if HTC would accept it?

The problem is, the A20 is a war weary, flying with a B24 Combat Group as a 'hack', not in the markings it would have carried in combat.  It was probably a hand me down from 3rd Attack Group, but would not have worn the 90th BG markings as shown in the photos.