Look dude, I don't hit anybody, especially not a woman. So here is my thing....Until you get somebody to proofread your typing, I'm just going ignore you a little bit more. I even tried to be nice to you and say those were nice. But in truth, you clearly know nothing about retouching your photos.
Oh and if "hit" means what I think you mean.... Then you don't read English all that well either.
One more thing..... When you don't use the correct terms, you look like the GWC you are. Nobody says PP...... It's called "Post" Learn it, live it, know it.....
FOOL!
I don't get you, you hit models you shoot???????????? 
I was asking about any good pictures...........
You're wrong. So now you know that.
You do have a half truth in there however..... Royalties..... But that would also imply I am selling something, no? So that is why you are still wrong. It was a good try though.
And the other comment is so untrue.... I know nothing about Quantum Physics. And I wouldn't try to sound like I did.
Correct me if I'm wrong... And, Logan, I hope you have releases for all those pictures you upped on here. Yes, constitutionally you give up some freedom and have the possibility of being photographed, when in public. Yet, if you as a business use pictures of individuals without their knowledge and consent, you are defrauding them of any royalties you earn from their use.
But of course, you already knew that. You already act like you know everything.
