Stiglr - it's always bugged me how much time our ancestors must have spent making sure that everything they made looked like "old, beatup military equipment with none of that glossy, fake Pixar look or any of the cartoonish look"

.
Look in any museum/movie/whatever that stupidly (IMHO) cries for "authenticity" - do you really think that those Spits, 109s, 38s etc were coming out of the factories with scratched cockpits? Did they all back then listened to the radios which looked like they were at least 50 years old or read books "staright outta antique book store"? The only chance for most of those planes to get a scratch in a cockpit would be when a 20mm shell exploded next to it having gone through an armour plate and a pilot first... Most of them simply didn't live long enough to acquire that "pseudo-authentic" old-warhorse look.
BTW - when I mentioned MS CFS I was referring to the actual flight and gunnery modelling of the darn thing, not the graphics - but the art is crappy too - I wrote a long piece on AGW about it when CFS first came out listing all the "inadequacies".
Once again - 6 people of HTC vs MS backed team producing commercial (boxed game) product... Err.. Umm... Sorry MS team - better luck next time.
I still think that the very first 3D models in WB looked the best. FT crafted magic on those planes - they looked real enough to touch. (Granted, they didn't have moving control surfaces, 3D cockpits etc...

)
Was watching BoB programs yesterday - airshows at Duxford, Biggin Hill etc - there was a 109E there beautifully restored to it's original condition (the only flying 109E?). It looked
authentic, it looked like
new - as it did 60 years ago...
------------------
lynx
13 Sqn RAF
[This message has been edited by -lynx- (edited 09-18-2000).]