gosh...
And here I thought a link titled SOURCE at the bottom would be enough.
(and pray tell at this "other forum" do show where I copy/paste things w/o giving credit or a source to the extend that you can call it a "signature" of mine. that is just laughable)
Apparently some people need you to hold their hand and click the mouse for 'em. Next time I will remember to increase the font for the link, bold it, and type in caps MORAY CLICK HERE with arrows pointing towards the link.
It would look something like this.
SOURCE <= MORAY CLICK HERE
Tell me if this is sufficent or should I change the color.
(and yes, sorry for the HiJack TxMom)
Yup. You posted a source. (I guess you failed to see the sarcasm in my point about your "source" or lack thereof, sarcasm doesn't translate well on a forum, i guess.) A source that does the exact same thing you do..... Start with an opinion (Hell, they even
say this in their mission statement, that should be your first clue) and attempt to find a paper(s) which supports that opinion, regardless of the authorship.(Some of em are really laughable) AGAIN, THIS IS NOT HOW SCIENCE WORKS. They don't do any of the work, and probably don't understand the work they cite to begin with. It is so flawed in thought, that an undergraduate in any science could probably detect the problems.
Move that diatribe you posted to a fresh topic, and I will systematically show you where you are wrong. (in actuality, the person(people) who are wrong are the ones you are cutting and pasting from, as you are unable to formulate your own ideology from the facts present.)
Again TxMom, very good find. Apologies for the hijacks.