« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Engine vs. Bird test  (Read 712 times)

Offline wooly15

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 332
Engine vs. Bird test
« on: February 06, 2009, 01:24:17 PM »
Logged

Offline zoozoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1734
      • http://myspace.com/zachisbackforasnack
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2009, 01:52:02 PM »
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNN NNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGG
 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
Logged
Zoozoo
Jokers Jokers
zoozoo fighter ace issue one:
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,240022.0.html

Offline avionix

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2009, 02:36:01 PM »
Yeah!!!!  That's nice. 
Logged
treekilr in game.   
"Please. This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue over who killed who..."

Offline WilldCrd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2565
      • http://www.wildaces.org
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2009, 02:43:24 PM »
Duck vs. Jet = both FAIL!!!! :O

anybody see the video's underneath this one? they had one of a plane loosing its wings
Logged
Crap now I gotta redo my cool sig.....crap!!! I cant remeber how to do it all !!!!!

Offline wooly15

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 332
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2009, 02:44:31 PM »
I saw that too...looks like somebody doing aerobatics in something not designed to.
Logged

Offline Seafit

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2009, 03:23:55 PM »
I don't think that video is labeled correctly.
It looks more like a compressor blade containment test. Look at the start and you can see a blade clearly marked in high visibility markings, that blade is then broken/released and the test is to make sure it is contained within the engine (rather than fly off and rip the aircraft apart).
I've seen similar tests (TV not in person) when they were demonstrating the new A380 engines.

Pretty spectacular though!
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 03:36:09 PM by Seafit »
Logged

Offline Curlew

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2009, 03:28:18 PM »
 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
Logged
It is I, Ens. Pulver! And I have just thrown your palm tree overboard!
Quote from: Helm
The best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Callsign---Curlew

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2009, 03:47:12 PM »
Quote from: WilldCrd on February 06, 2009, 02:43:24 PM
Duck vs. Jet = both FAIL!!!! :O

anybody see the video's underneath this one? they had one of a plane loosing its wings

A-20ish



wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline wooly15

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 332
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2009, 06:11:52 PM »
Quote from: Seafit on February 06, 2009, 03:23:55 PM
I don't think that video is labeled correctly.
It looks more like a compressor blade containment test. Look at the start and you can see a blade clearly marked in high visibility markings, that blade is then broken/released and the test is to make sure it is contained within the engine (rather than fly off and rip the aircraft apart).
I've seen similar tests (TV not in person) when they were demonstrating the new A380 engines.

Pretty spectacular though!

I agree...as hard as I looked, I could not see anything thrown in the intake,
Logged

Offline CyranoAH

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2304
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2009, 11:53:11 AM »
No duck was harmed in the production of this video. As Seafit correctly noted, it's a blade failure test, and this engine passed it  (it did not disintegrate or threw shrapnel)

Daniel
Logged

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2009, 10:15:47 PM »
I think that the plane with the wings that fell off was an aero commander.  I think Bud Anderson flew that exact same kind of plane for years on the airshow circuit, and it turns out that the plane had a design flaw the whole time and he was probably half a G from ripping the wings off.  Some other guy just did it first, and after the investigation Anderson never flew that plane in a demo again.  I heard he was pissed at the company for having him basically be a flying salesman doing aerobatics in a plane with a weak wing.

Edit:  Yea it was Bob Hoover, not Anderson.  My mistake.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2009, 10:21:26 PM by eagl »
Logged
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2009, 10:17:45 PM »
I think you are thinking of Bob Hoover.
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2009, 10:21:02 PM »
Quote from: Chalenge on February 07, 2009, 10:17:45 PM
I think you are thinking of Bob Hoover.

Whoops, you're right.  It was Hoover.
Logged
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline MoeRon

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2009, 12:35:48 PM »
Logged
Lotteries are a tax for people who suck at math.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15838
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: Engine vs. Bird test
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2009, 12:39:32 PM »
Logged
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »