Author Topic: Need More Carrier Planes (Read 1873 times)

brady · « **Reply #15 on:** December 27, 2000, 06:22:00 PM »

Aichi B7A2

Brady

------------------

[This message has been edited by brady (edited 12-27-2000).]

jihad · « **Reply #16 on:** December 27, 2000, 10:52:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by funked:
Val
Kate
Dauntless
Bf 109T
Ju 87C

This list isn`t complete w/o the F4F or an even better choice would be the FM-2.

Then add the KI-61 and we could run a New Guinea scenario in the SEA.

-lazs- · « **Reply #17 on:** December 28, 2000, 08:39:00 AM »

Yep... FM2 or -3 wildcat. They both perform about the same. No carrier sim is worthy of the name without em.
lazs

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #18 on:** December 29, 2000, 02:27:00 PM »

How big was the chance to find the Chog on a carrier in woII. (200 build) hmmmm weren't they send for landbased operations.

Could have been on service for only a trial period is my guess.

Hans · « **Reply #19 on:** December 29, 2000, 10:31:00 PM »

You don't really need dive bombers. The Corsair and Hellcat have enough bombs for that use. I am sure this is why there are no dive bombers.

Untill we get an early war planeset the dive bombers are probably going to have to wait.

Hans.

juzz · « **Reply #20 on:** December 29, 2000, 10:49:00 PM »

Ju 87D is worth doing because it can carry a 4,000lb bombload.

Torgo · « **Reply #21 on:** December 30, 2000, 08:31:00 PM »

Bug,

I more than anyone would like to see the CHOG made a perk plane, and feel its addition to the game was a mistake and blatant "look what we have that WB doesn't"-ism.

However, the CHOG WAS carrier based in combat..not land-based.

And while it wasn't in combat for very long, the 200 CHogs built were in intense combat around Okinawa for several months, with quite a few kills of Japanese AC.

Author Topic: Need More Carrier Planes (Read 1873 times)

-lazs-

Hans