Author Topic: C202 Convergence  (Read 696 times)

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1846
C202 Convergence
« on: February 11, 2009, 04:50:58 PM »
Hello,

I love the C202.  There I said it.

What convergence and gun load out you have found most affective in the C202?


Thanks for your advice,

Slade  :salute
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1846
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2009, 05:30:27 PM »
Hmmm...

Just landed 2 kills in my C202 against B-24s (yeah I cannot believe it either).  Convergence set to 400 with full gun load out.

That worked OK for bombers but I'm gonna tweak it back for fighters (375,350 etc.).

Slade
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2009, 06:28:25 PM »
I like 300 in the C202. I only take the .50's, BTW.
Fun airplane :)

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2009, 09:05:58 PM »
I would suggest something sub 350, I belive my convergence is set for 300 on that plane.
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline trotter

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 817
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2009, 12:15:16 AM »
I would recommend 300, perhaps less.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9368
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2009, 07:48:23 AM »
I would recommend 300, perhaps less.

Agreed.  The 12.7mm nose guns in the 202 may be half an inch in diameter, but they don't have anything like the punch of the US M2 .50 - except at very close range (under 200 yards), where they're quite effective.  (Didn't I read in one of these threads, some years ago, that the Italians had a mouse-sized explosive charge in the 12.7s?)  So I set them to 200 and take no shots beyond that.

The 7.7s present the same problem as the .303s on cannon-armed Spitfires.  They're perfectly useless beyond 200 yards, both in trajectory and in stopping power, so you have to set them for a close convergence.  200 yards works for me, although probably 175 would be better.  Having all guns set at 200 yards reminds me to hold fire until I'm that close.

- oldman

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2009, 05:08:14 PM »
Keep in mind the wing guns are only 7mm. Think Hurr1. You want to be between 150 and 250 yards when using those. The 50cals are pretty decent, but as stated not as good as US 50cals. The thing with them is that they hit a LOT harder when you fire them closer. Landing hits at 400 is just wasting ammo compared to landing hits at 200.

I set mine to about 250, and I try to get kills inside that range.

It's like flying a Hurr1. You set them in close, where you can actually DO damage, rather than further out where you just "tickle" the enemy.

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1846
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2009, 06:53:37 AM »
Thanks for the advice guys!  :salute
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: C202 Convergence
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2009, 05:34:40 AM »
I have it at max, and lob from a longer distance. Only use the 2x50's. Just aim above.
Since the ROF isn't that great, and the clip is decent, you can start landing hits while closing.
The wing guns are pretty useless, and getting rid of them saves weight.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)