I <3 the Knights

[Masherbrum]

No explanation was solicited .


To be perfectly honest, your Correct!  You don't need anyone's approval to post immature, pointless content, "have at it", show everyone how antagonistic you can actually be...your already off to a good start by posting an argument that was absolutely immature AND pointless...understand?? Good!! E.O.T.   

.....and your response was any more "to the point?"   If his topic was "as you say it is", why not just move on and not reply?  It's like a car wreck on the side of a road, there are those that just have to break their neck gawking.   

[Banshee7]

No explanation was solicited .


To be perfectly honest, you're Correct!  You don't need anyone's approval to post immature, pointless content, "have at it", show everyone how antagonistic you can actually be...you're already off to a good start by posting an argument that was absolutely immature AND pointless...understand?? Good!! E.O.T.   

I can be a Richardhead too, I'll be a grammar police this time.  In the quote above I used the correct "you're."

Also, DO explain how I am being "antagonistic?"

[John Curnutte]

 Hey Banshee if you fight on Knights side , I'm happy to see ya there . This garbage about spying is totally out of hand . Don't let a bunch of wahoos get you down bud , its just not worth it .
                                                       Nutte

[SoonerMP]

No explanation was solicited .


To be perfectly honest, your Correct!  You don't need anyone's approval to post immature, pointless content, "have at it", show everyone how antagonistic you can actually be...your already off to a good start by posting an argument that was absolutely immature AND pointless...understand?? Good!! E.O.T.   

And you think your little remarks ever accomplish anything?

[Ack-Ack]

Also, DO explain how I am being "antagonistic?"

D'UH!  By spying, sheesh. 

Going to call you Agent 00Banshee7 from now on.



ack-ack

[kilz]

WOW Banshee you and i have had our moments one here not to long ago but damn thats some stupid crap right there. we got the same thing when my squad started doing tours with all the countrys out there. after the first two tours. crazy stuff. i hate belonging to one country.

[Banshee7]

D'UH!  By spying, sheesh. 

Going to call you Agent 00Banshee7 from now on.



ack-ack

check sig 

[LTARogue]

Hey Banshee thanks for that info on the CV BTW.............Doh!! I mean for the tactical tips, yeah, thats what I meant.....

LTARogue

[helbent]

When Banshee switches sides, I for one (rook) do not fear that our tactical information has been comprimised in the least.  Nor would I ever expect tactical information to be relayed from him.  If he were to receive tactical info, I would not believe it.

On the other hand, if I were to encounter this OG "fella" as a rook, I would be very suspicious of his intent.

If done with honor and fair gamesmanship this is a non issue.  The only ones that object to such behavior, are exactly the ones that I would expect it from.

HB

[Lusche]

The only ones that object to such behavior, are exactly the ones that I would expect it from.

I found that to be true more than one time in the past...

[Shuffler]

In the MW a few weeks a go there was a pilot on the side I was on telling us there was a mission in bound with info on liftoff to destination. He said a friend pm'd him the info. I immediately informed the other side on open channel about a mole in their group. The pilot on the team I was on was not happy but several folks on the other side thanked me. I don't see any reason to spy in a game. As most of you know I fly on whatever team has the fewest numbers so when I stand for one I stand for all. I do shoot the red guys though.

[Dadsguns]

In the MW a few weeks a go there was a pilot on the side I was on telling us there was a mission in bound with info on liftoff to destination. He said a friend pm'd him the info. I immediately informed the other side on open channel about a mole in their group. The pilot on the team I was on was not happy but several folks on the other side thanked me. I don't see any reason to spy in a game.

   I agree with you.  

Not to speak for OG or Banshee, but OG comments might have come across wrong, but to be honest, there are two sides to everyones story.  We all know there have been instances where many "patriotic country switchers" that are involved with some gamey things.  Now with that said, that by no means implies Banshee of anything, but of course their are two sides to every story.  Banshee just claims to deny that he was involved in anything, OG clearly thinks he did. 
So, may I suggest something, tread lightly when you decide to switch to a chess piece, there is a fine line of you being there to help or hinder, some have accomplished both. 

As most of you know I fly on whatever team has the fewest numbers so when I stand for one I stand for all.

Could you explain this statement a little further.  At what point do you switch, how often do you switch, do you check the roster frequently? etc etc.

[Ghosth]

Especially in the lower populated arena's side switching should not be consider spying.

If I log into midwar, and find 25 knights beating up on 8 bish and 10 rooks I'll switch to bishop if not every time, quite often.

While I prefer to fly knight, I'm certainly not switching to do anything for the knights. I'd simply rather not be hindered by ENY requirements, and dislike seeing unopposed land grabbing for land grabbings sake.

But then thats just me. If a bit of me has rubbed off on banshee (and I'd be suprised if it hadn't)
Well then take it at face value.

[helbent]

Especially in the lower populated arena's side switching should not be consider spying.

If I log into midwar, and find 25 knights beating up on 8 bish and 10 rooks I'll switch to bishop if not every time, quite often.

While I prefer to fly knight, I'm certainly not switching to do anything for the knights. I'd simply rather not be hindered by ENY requirements, and dislike seeing unopposed land grabbing for land grabbings sake.

But then thats just me. If a bit of me has rubbed off on banshee (and I'd be suprised if it hadn't)
Well then take it at face value.

Isnt that the reason we have ENY in the first place?  I just fail to see what all the fuss is about.

And then of course my reasoning gets blasted.  Yesterday a player comes rook from bish and immediatley announces on local voxx that a bish 110 mission is inb, and sets out to pick.  Just plain stupid.  Far be it from me to let this behavior go unrecognised, I called him on it on 200 and country ch.

Once again, it is up to ourselves to expose the dweebiness of some.

[Shuffler]

Could you explain this statement a little further.  At what point do you switch, how often do you switch, do you check the roster frequently? etc etc.

I switch when I first enter the room. As I am upping and flying I do check roster from time to time. There are a lot of fluctuations so I don't just change immediately upon seeing a numbers descrepancy. If I notice the numbers really getting off at some time I will switch. I usually announce I am moving, not always though. When I go to another side I just simply start flying for them. I never move on any mission that I saw posted on the other team or use any other information that was available. I do not and never would devulge such info either as it would just not be fair. I fly for the green guys and shoot the red guys.

When I look at numbers I also look at the map. If there are no fights currently going on with that side I may wait till they are being attacked to move. The idea is to get on a side where fights can be had at the drop of a hat. It also helps even teams which keeps the eny in check for all involved.

Most do not mind and welcome me to the fold. A very few get all wrinkled over the fact. A major thing you'll find flying all sides is the fact they are all much more alike than different. <S> Dadsguns