Author Topic: carrier based aircraft  (Read 1472 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2009, 10:33:27 PM »
If you're gonna wish for a Carrier based plane, at least wish for a real one!!

This is the plane that was developed from some of the metal from the B-29 that dropped the nuke on Japan!

The blast gave the metal unique properties that took years to understand and put to good use.

And gentlemen, this is the final result!!


This is the only good thing to come out of that piece of crap:

« Last Edit: March 22, 2009, 10:35:53 PM by Saxman »
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2009, 11:38:30 PM »
LoL, Looks like I need to make you another avatar.
if you don't mind that is.  :P

-FYB
Most skill based sport? -
The sport of understanding women.

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2009, 11:47:38 PM »
This is the only good thing to come out of that piece of crap:

(Image removed from quote.)
Aint it the truth
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline TheZohan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2009, 11:55:03 PM »
carrier based aircraft



Offline Tec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2009, 12:05:07 AM »
if you don't mind that is.  :P

-FYB

I like making them.  What you want this time? Scarface theme?  Let me know.
To each their pwn.
K$22L7AoH

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2009, 02:23:25 AM »
I don't recall medium bombers ever being BASED on a carrier.


Also not BASED on carriers:







wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline TheZohan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2009, 02:43:52 AM »
i think they where on the ranger

Steaming to Quonset Point, R.I., Ranger loaded 68 Army P-40 planes and men of the Army's 33d Pursuit Squadron, put to sea 22 April, and launched the Army squadron 10 May to land at Accra, on the Gold Coast of Africa. She returned to Quonset Point 28 May 1942, made a patrol to Argentia, then stood out of Newport 1 July with 72 Army P-40 pursuit planes, which she launched off the coast of Africa for Accra the 19th. After calling at Trinidad, she returned to Norfolk for local battle practice until 1 October, then based her training at Bermuda in company with four escort aircraft carriers that had been newly converted from tankers to meet the need for naval air power in the Atlantic

the ranger and the langley was used to launch P-40s off of many times to africa

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1881091719506867793


On 23 June Manila Bay came under enemy air attack during refueling operations east of Saipan. Two fighter bombers attacked her from dead ahead, dropping four bombs which exploded wide to port. Intense anti-aircraft fire suppressed further attacks; and, as a precautionary and rather unusual move which Admiral Spruance later characterized as "commendable initiative", Manila Bay launched four of the Army P-47's she was ferrying to fly protective CAP until radar screens were clear of contacts
« Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 02:53:46 AM by TheZohan »

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2009, 06:30:21 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)
 :rofl

It looks like they're pushing it over the side!

Perhaps they prefer the F4U-4? :D

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #23 on: March 23, 2009, 08:03:59 AM »
Are the 25Cs still able to get off the CV?
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #24 on: March 23, 2009, 09:18:48 AM »
If you're gonna wish for a Carrier based plane, at least wish for a real one!!

This is the plane that was developed from some of the metal from the B-29 that dropped the nuke on Japan!

The blast gave the metal unique properties that took years to understand and put to good use.

And gentlemen, this is the final result!!
 ;)


You know a buddy of mine (another engineer no less) sent me that picture abut a year ago. He was incredulous that the NAVY had managed to keep the program so secret that even those of us in the industry were kept clueless. I showed him the shot of Jessica Biel in the cockpit and asked him who he thought was clueless now.
:rofl

(BTW, according www.the-numbers.com back when it came out, Stealth was the biggest money loser in movie history. Something like $240 Million was spent making that joke)
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline rapp25

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 277
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2009, 12:38:18 PM »
If the x-wing is introduced even the wirbel will have trouble with it so I suggest for balance reason we add this:


Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #26 on: March 24, 2009, 10:32:59 PM »
the germans had at-at it must be true, I read it in wookiepedia
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline trigger2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1342
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #27 on: March 25, 2009, 12:13:45 AM »
the germans had at-at it must be true, I read it in wookiepedia
They also had yellow-vampire distractions!!



O.O
Sometimes, we just need to remember what the rules of life really are: You only
need two tools: WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the
WD-40. If it shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape.
*TAs Aerofighters Inc.*

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #28 on: March 25, 2009, 11:35:31 AM »
Beat me to the punch!
Yes it's real, a real movie prop from the movie Stealth.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: carrier based aircraft
« Reply #29 on: March 25, 2009, 11:44:08 AM »
If the x-wing is introduced even the wirbel will have trouble with it so I suggest for balance reason we add this:

(Image removed from quote.)
Now that really is unbalancing it, so we need to counter that!

seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack