Author Topic: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French  (Read 793 times)

Offline 68Wooley

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« on: March 20, 2009, 11:34:04 AM »
Everyone remember this from about a month ago:

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,258640.0.html

Well, seems the US Navy, not to be outdone by their allies, has gotten in on the act....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7955185.stm
« Last Edit: March 20, 2009, 01:17:05 PM by 68Wooley »

Offline crazyivan

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3920
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2009, 12:12:33 PM »
Blue water, brown water. 2 subs in open water is still the best IMO. US hit's surface vessels all the time(sarcasm). Thinking back afew years ago, about the Hawaii collision. Russians must be next. :D
POTW
"Atleast I have chicken!"- Leroy Jenkins

Offline allaire

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1239
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2009, 09:53:31 PM »
See in the US we do it the right way.  Collide with our own ships.  That way we don't have to apologize to any other countries. :rofl
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2009, 02:35:48 AM »
Blue water, brown water. 2 subs in open water is still the best IMO. US hit's surface vessels all the time(sarcasm). Thinking back afew years ago, about the Hawaii collision. Russians must be next. :D

The Greenville. (SP?) I met a guy who worked on her... She has the worst history of any boat I have heard! TWO surface collisions, two or three underwater collisions with things like undersea mountains, and I believe he said she ran aground heading back to the East Coast to repair/refit!

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2009, 04:49:42 AM »
youd think they would have better systems now to aviod this :noid
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2009, 08:39:07 AM »
youd think they would have better systems now to aviod this :noid

have you ever seen the "cain mutiny"?

helmsman:: "captain, we are about to run over our own tow rope".

captain::  "are you questioning my order sailor"?

Offline Swager

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2009, 09:52:03 AM »
The nuclear submarine force is not as effective as it was 20-30 years ago.  They were at their peak during the Cold War.  There are more of these collisions and mishaps now than ever and there are less submarines in the force. 

Product of a kinder, gentler Navy.
Rock:  Ya see that Ensign, lighting the cigarette?
Powell: Yes Rock.
Rock: Well that's where I got it, he's my son.
Powell: Really Rock, well I'd like to meet him.
Rock:  No ya wouldn't.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2009, 02:21:33 PM »
have you ever seen the "cain mutiny"?

Great movie :aok
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Curlew

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2009, 03:54:15 PM »
Russians must be next. :D

dude, they dont need to hit anybody, their subs just sink on thier own, *cough*cough*kursk*cough*
It is I, Ens. Pulver! And I have just thrown your palm tree overboard!
Quote from: Helm
The best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Callsign---Curlew

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2009, 04:40:36 PM »
youd think they would have better systems now to aviod this :noid

The windows were probably dirty.  Couldn't see where they were going.  Or, maybe a headlight out.



wrongway

 :lol
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline C(Sea)Bass

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1644
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2009, 11:17:21 PM »
dude, they dont need to hit anybody, their subs just sink on thier own, *cough*cough*kursk*cough*

The one they donated to a museum in Providence, RI sank at its berth during a storm because the hatches were not water proof.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2009, 11:18:50 PM »
The one they donated to a museum in Providence, RI sank at its berth during a storm because the hatches were not water proof.

Wait... no... seriously?!? A submarine... without waterproof hatches...?!? Any link to a news article? lol

Offline C(Sea)Bass

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1644
Re: US Navy Keeping Up with the Brits and French
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2009, 11:27:48 PM »
Wait... no... seriously?!? A submarine... without waterproof hatches...?!? Any link to a news article? lol
http://www.juliett484.org/juliett/news/archive/whathappened.html

Quote
These hatches were weather-tight but not waterproof--the oval surface ship type that could be dogged shut.

Under the conditions described above, the access hatch to the aft torpedo room eventually started to slowly flood. Sub crew members wanted to go aboard to to start pumps or turn on compressors, but public safety officials would not allow anyone to go aboard.