Author Topic: M26 Pershing  (Read 2061 times)

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2009, 04:08:44 PM »
A Sherman first approached the panther and was knocked out. Then the M-26 took out the Panther.
That's a great vid. It provides a pretty sobering view of war from the tanker's perspective. I found myself feeling sympathy for the Sherman crew and the Panther crew.

that t28 looks crazy what kind of gun was on it?
That's a 105.
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline hlbly

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1013
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2009, 04:38:09 PM »
I believe less than 60 M-26s saw service in WWII.  There could have been more and earlier but Patton chose the M-4 for priority instead.

If you want to use the Ostwind/Wirblewind argument, they are unique vehicles that filled a niche in AH2 for an armored AAA vehicle.  The M-26 is just another tank with a big gun.

No.



wrongway
the sherman was chosen for 1 simple reason . LST's were designed to carry them . The entire invasion planning was based on number of LST's available . think the M-16 covered armored AA vehicles .

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2009, 04:52:02 PM »
Most of you have probably seen this. Good video of what the 90mm can do to a Panther. Side aspect shot at close range, but still gives you an idea of the 90mm's power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt5bJQOkI1g

Would most likely be heavily perked.

I doubt heavily, but definitely perked.

Also noticed where all 3 90mm shells hit the Panther. That was pretty cool, you could see the holes in the fire.
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2009, 05:00:39 PM »
     Gods, how I love tank snobs in this game...almost as funny as the
plane snob folks  :aok

Imagine the uproar if this Pershing version was asked for.




ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2009, 05:39:42 PM »
Imagine the uproar if this Pershing version was asked for.

(Image removed from quote.)


ack-ack

Thats overkill, lol. The Basic 90MM on the standard M26 is more then enough gun to deal with all the tanks currently in the game. .

I would love to see the M26 in the game, but only about 400 units made it to Europe before the war ended.

An M4A3E8 with 76MM gun or a basic M4 would fit better.

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2009, 06:44:09 PM »
Imagine the uproar if this Pershing version was asked for.

(Image removed from quote.)


ack-ack

Jeez! Now I know what it would look like to walk into a cat house with a 12 in gun. :rofl sir lead the way :devil
« Last Edit: March 27, 2009, 06:56:29 PM by ToeTag »
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #21 on: March 27, 2009, 06:45:28 PM »
Thats overkill, lol. The Basic 90MM on the standard M26 is more then enough gun to deal with all the tanks currently in the game. .



Yeah, that picture is of the only Super Pershing (M26-E4) to see service and action in the ETO with the 33rd Armored Regiment/3rd AD.  It's only saw 10 days of combat.  It was equipped with a 90 mm/70 caliber T15E1 high-velocity gun.  Here is the story of the only combat during its very brief combat tour.

Quote
DUEL AT DESSAU
on April 21, 1945
A Spearhead One-on-One Tank Victory

Only three days before the 3rd Armored Division's final combat action of WWII, a Super Pershing of the 33rd Armored Regiment met and defeated the most powerful and most heavily armored German tank of the war - the legendary 77-ton King Tiger, also known as the Tiger II or Tiger Royal. It would be the first and only meeting between a King Tiger and the Super Pershing, a modified standard M26 Pershing weighing 53 tons - an almost "secret" tank that, to this day, remains largely an enigma to military historians.

Only two Super Pershings were ever built, and the 3AD had the only one in the European Theater - an experimental version with its remarkably long barrel. Arriving very late in the war (March, 1945), it was field tested and modified inside Germany and subsequently saw about ten days of actual combat action, beginning several days after the Battle of Paderborn and ending with the Battle of Dessau on the Elbe River.

The Super Pershing (aka T26E4-1) was equipped with a new long-barreled T15E1 90mm gun that was designed to out-perform the German high-velocity 88mm on the King Tiger. This new U.S. gun had successfully penetrated 8.5 inches of armor at 1,000 yards at 30 degrees. Even more remarkable, it had penetrated 13 inches of armor at 100 yards. The special 90mm ammunition had produced a muzzle velocity of 3,850 feet per second, or some 600 feet per second faster than the 88mm of the King Tiger. But in testing, the new 90mm also proved to have amazing range and accuracy.

Army ordnance technicians (in the U.S. and Europe) had been anxious about getting the new tank into combat, hoping to match it against a King Tiger. But by April, 1945, German armor west of Berlin had dramatically thinned out, not to mention an extreme shortage of fuel, and the odds of spotting the monster German tank were slim. But in Dessau on April 21, "luck" would befall the Super Pershing crew commanded by SSgt Joe Maduri, a veteran 3AD tanker in his tenth straight month of combat.

The 3AD had begun a four-pronged attack on the city, which was heavily defended. Division armor were finally able to enter the city slowly after numerous concrete tank barriers were destroyed. With 3AD tanks fanning out, and 36th Infantry riflemen following, the Super Pershing reached an intersection and began to round a corner to its right. Unknown to its crew, a King Tiger had apparently been waiting in ambush at a distance of two blocks or roughly 600 yards away, and in the same direction that the Americans were turning into.

At this distance, easily within its capability, the Tiger fired at the Super Pershing. But its infamous high-velocity 88mm shell, of the type that had destroyed so many American tanks and vehicles during the war, went high and was not even close. Gunner Cpl John "Jack" Irwin, only 18 years old, responded almost instantly with a round that struck the Tiger's huge angled glasis, or front plate. But the shot, a non-armor-piercing high explosive (HE) shell, had no effect. Ricocheting off the armor, it shot skyward and exploded harmlessly. The Super Pershing had been loaded with an HE only because Irwin had been expecting urban targets, such as buildings, personnel, and light anti-tank guns. "AP!", he shouted to his loader "Pete," which meant an armor-piercing shell would be next.

Maduri and crew then felt a concussion or thud on the turret. It was never known if this shot came from the Tiger, or from some other anti-tank weapon. In any case, no serious damage was done - probably a lucky glancing impact. In the next instant, Irwin aimed and fired a second time, just as the royal monster was moving forward and raising up over a pile of rubble. The 90mm AP round penetrated the Tiger's underbelly, apparently striking the ammo well and resulting in a tremendous explosion that blew its turret loose. With near certainty, the entire crew was killed.

But there was no time to examine their "trophy." A battle was raging, and the Super Pershing continued down the street, passing the lifeless and burning King Tiger. Tough fighting still lay ahead, as German bazooka, Panzerfaust, and machine-gun fire came from windows and doorways.

The encounter with the King Tiger had been "short and sweet," lasting less than twenty seconds. It may not have been the titanic "slug fest" that could have occurred on an open field, but it was an overwhelming victory for the quick-reacting Super Pershing crew. The battle for Dessau would end completely on the following day, but not without the Super Pershing destroying another German heavy tank (believed to be a 50-ton Panther Mark V) with two shots. The first disabling its drive sprocket, and the second round completely penetrating the tank's side armor. That apparently set off an internal blast, again probably from stored ammo. And, still in Dessau, that was followed by Maduri and crew forcing the commander of a German medium tank to surrender without firing a shot. For the German crew, out of ammo for their main gun, the intimidating "look" of that long-barrel 90mm gun that must have destroyed any remaining will to fight or flee.



ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #22 on: March 27, 2009, 07:11:29 PM »
An M4A3E8 with 76MM gun or a basic M4 would fit better.

YES! Yes yes yes yes yes.

Easy Eight!

Want want want!
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #23 on: March 27, 2009, 07:32:33 PM »
OK basic M-4 is more worthless than the t76.  If you up it you'll get killed by a pony and 50 cal and M8's oh my.
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #24 on: March 27, 2009, 07:49:20 PM »
I would think a better tank to introduce would be the M4A-3 E8 (Easy 8) and I do believe someone else metnioned.  It was a upgunned sherman but retained the shermans speed and maintainability.  I would fit in well between the panzer and the tiger/firefly and I don't think it would require a perk.  Spces below:

Weight : 33.7 ton
Dimensions: 7.54 x 2.99 x 3.00 mt
Armor (max) : 108 mm (4.25 inches)
Primary armament : 1x76 mm gun
Secondary armament : n1x .50 MG + 2x .30 MG
Crew : 5
Engine : liquid-cooled V-8 Ford
Fuel : 80 octane gasoline (168 gallons)
Engine oil : 32 quarts
Horsepower : 500 (gross) 450(net)
Range : 160 km
Speed (max - route) : 42 km/hr
Maximum Grade : 60 per cent
Maximum Trench : 2.13 mt
Maximum Vertical Wall : 0.60 mt
Maximum Fording Depth : 0.91 mt
ARMOR
Type : Turret, cast homogeneous steel; Hull, rolled and cast homogeneous steel; Welded assembly

Hull Thickness Actual  Angle w/vertical
Front, upper 2.5 inches 47 degrees
Front, lower 4.25 to 2.0 inches 0 to 56 degrees
Sides 1.5 inches 0 degrees
Rear  1.5 inches 10 to 22 degrees
Top  0.75 inches 83 to 90 degrees
Floor, front 1.0 inches 90 degrees
Floor, rear 0.5 inches 90 degrees
Turret Thickness
 Actual  Angle w/vertical
Gun shield 3.5 inches 0 degrees
Front 2.5 inches 40 to 45 degrees
Sides 2.5 inches 0 to 13 degrees
Rear 2.5 inches 0 degrees
Top 1.0 inches 90 degrees


Out,
BigKev

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #25 on: March 27, 2009, 07:56:33 PM »
I don't think the armour hitboxes are very accurate so I wouldn't be inclined to agree with people who say a panther should be heavily perked because of its frontal armour.
:huh

"Hit box" in AH is the shape of the object.  Not sure what you are talking about?
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #26 on: March 27, 2009, 07:59:37 PM »
Do you guys think the Sherman 76mm (not firefly) would be a good match to the Panzer IV we have in-game?

:salute
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #27 on: March 27, 2009, 08:37:04 PM »
Do you guys think the Sherman 76mm (not firefly) would be a good match to the Panzer IV we have in-game?

:salute

Yes it would be a good match, and the E8 version of the Sherman I think would have the Edge over all.

Bigkev,
 "Easy 8" was more mobile and slightly faster then the older Shermans. The reason being the E8 used the much wider HVSS suspension. That with the 500 HP V8 in the A3 version of the Sherman made for a very big improvement over the older models.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #28 on: March 27, 2009, 08:38:01 PM »
Yeah, that picture is of the only Super Pershing (M26-E4) to see service and action in the ETO with the 33rd Armored Regiment/3rd AD.  It's only saw 10 days of combat.  It was equipped with a 90 mm/70 caliber T15E1 high-velocity gun.  Here is the story of the only combat during its very brief combat tour.



ack-ack

Good stuff thanks Ack

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: M26 Pershing
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2009, 08:48:00 PM »
Couple of better shots of the "Super Pershing"





Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.