I might be wrong so please dont flame...

[Curly]

 Pyro said " numbers or that it did not see combat" was not the criteria. How many of you bozos are goinbg to read MORE into it than that?

 Who the hell saw HTC will model prototypes, "what if's" and Roswell sh&t anywhere.

 Cripes you people have sand stone for gray matter.

  Curly

[Nath-BDP]

Focke-Wulf Ta 152: The Story of the Luftwaffe's Late-war High-Altitude Fighter.
Dietmar Harmann

[Nefarious]

 

Originally posted by CavemanJ:


Dinnae Pyro once post that neither production numbers nor seeing service were a prerequisite for a kite appearing in AH?  Or maybe it was HT?  I seem to recall seeing that from one or the other somewhere.  Might've been in the arena during a Q&A....

So I can't help but wonder why everyone always cites numbers produced and whether or not a particular model saw combat when HT and Pyro are gonna add whatever kite they want to add, based on whatever merits they see it as 'fit to add to AH' on.

well i was just being stupid with my reply about the YB-49 and the XB-70...

no need to take it seriously folkz...

but i really think they should make an early war planeset before releasing Luftwaffe/American/Japanese/Italian aircraft that saw little or no service at the end of the war..

by making aircraft that never saw service or very little service diminishes the chance we will get an early war planeset in other words we would have no need for an early war planset unless 1) a historical arena is launched or 2) more early war scenarios are created. And since we dont have a HA or very many early war scenarios then there is no point of creating them...

but i would still like to see them

[Kieren]

Thanks for the reference, Nath.  

[pzvg]

Made in Roswell was more of a poke than a statement (some of you might not have sandstone for brains,but your sense of humor is kinda fossilized)  
Btw, numbers or did not see combat leaves the field wide open.

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"