Author Topic: m4a3 sherman and some others  (Read 8154 times)

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: m4a3 sherman and some others
« Reply #180 on: May 29, 2009, 02:21:47 PM »
angus im cool with someone being russian german chinese japanese or just a mix of the whole friggin world but no matter which way you put it each person is respectable you have a problem with a foreinor then shutup and keep it too your self but to me no matter where ya come from you and diehard shoulsd stop arguing and fighting or whatever.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: m4a3 sherman and some others
« Reply #181 on: May 29, 2009, 06:04:16 PM »
Could you please write this in understandable English?
(Which, by the way is not my first language)

It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: m4a3 sherman and some others
« Reply #182 on: June 06, 2009, 12:12:14 AM »
 I would rather see HTC fix the damage model then add more tanks.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: m4a3 sherman and some others
« Reply #183 on: June 07, 2009, 01:36:34 PM »
Al, there was a damage modeling thread a while back, sorry if you missed it, but how many planes do we have....?     and how many tanks do we have........?  EXACTLY :aok!!!!      besides unless you are talking aboud better damage modeling for the fighters where you loose lift for each bullet you take then drop it; buffs have a hard enough time already.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th