Author Topic: Bf109E-4 vs Bf109E-7 for BoB planeset  (Read 1564 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Bf109E-4 vs Bf109E-7 for BoB planeset
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2001, 03:55:00 AM »
O toejam Karnak ur right im sorry, im retarded and very very tired from studying so much. Many many apologies here. <S>  :)

To be honest it dont matter what we get as long as its early war. I especially like to get some early war P40, preferably the one used by AVG or the types used in the Pearl Harbor fighting. But not ever the P40N, that canopy design is ugly. I would also love the P39D. And of course the A6M2 and Wildcat to give them naval company.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Bf109E-4 vs Bf109E-7 for BoB planeset
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2001, 03:57:00 AM »
Karnak 109E7s used DTs a lot in the Med and North Africa. This was a very important battle area.

BTW there is no real additional work for CMs they can specify what the plane carries in the mission plan. Its easy to verify and thats all. I see no real DT issue here. Just disallow DT as appropriate.

[ 11-05-2001: Message edited by: GRUNHERZ ]

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
Bf109E-4 vs Bf109E-7 for BoB planeset
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2001, 09:57:00 PM »
Well that and Spit MKI Had fixed pitch prop floating Carb that cut off under Gs and once the engine was gone it was gone no RPM setting was allowed.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Bf109E-4 vs Bf109E-7 for BoB planeset
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2001, 03:00:00 AM »
Glasses,

Only the first 70 Spit Is had fixed pitch props.

All Spitfire MkIs and Spitfire MkIIs had float carbs.  Many Spit Vs and some Spit IXs did as well.

I've never heard that about the RPM setting.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-