F86!!

[Ack-Ack]

i know what im talking about you twittleing retards. im tired of this bullnoodles, you are twittleing wrong the F-86 comes from a redesigned P-51.

Why don't you put us all in our place and post your sources and while you're at it, post the source that said the Ho 229 saw combat action.  If you can show proof (with verifiable sources to back it up) that the F-86 is an evolution of the P-51 and the Ho 229 saw combat action (and armed with 30mm cannons) then I will pay for a month of your AH subscription.

Deal or no deal?


ack-ack

[fullmetalbullet]

Why don't you put us all in our place and post your sources and while you're at it, post the source that said the Ho 229 saw combat action.  If you can show proof (with verifiable sources to back it up) that the F-86 is an evolution of the P-51 and the Ho 229 saw combat action (and armed with 30mm cannons) then I will pay for a month of your AH subscription.

Deal or no deal?


ack-ack

its called the internet handsomehunk, LOOK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!

[Motherland]

its called the internet handsomehunk, LOOK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!

You can only find stuff on the internet (from decent sources) if it exists. You won't find anything saying that the Ho 229 saw combat or that the P51 was developed into the F86 because both statements are untrue.
The burden of proof is on you, as you're the one who's making the statement which goes against general knowledge.

[AWwrgwy]

Told you to throw him back.    

I the profanity filter.

Avacado


wrongway

[waystin2]

Man you hooked this one big time Larry. 

[SoonerMP]

its called the internet handsomehunk, LOOK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!

Handsomehunks PWN Amazin Hunks? Hhhmmmm.....

[Spikes]

i know what im talking about you twittleing retards. im tired of this bullnoodles, you are twittleing wrong the F-86 comes from a redesigned P-51.

...LOL.

P51 Profile:

F86 Profile:


P51 Top Profile:

F86 Top Profile:


Yeah...can't you guys see the resemblance?

[stroker71]

Wow 2 fisherman in one thread...cool!  One of ya need a new fishing hole. 

[Ack-Ack]

its called the internet handsomehunk, LOOK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!

I would suggest you follow your own advice and look it up.  If you have difficulty reading, I'm sure you can ask one of your parents to read it for you and explain it to you slowly in the hopes it will sink in. 

In any event, you failed to show any proof whatsoever of the F-86 being an evolution of the P-51 and you also failed at showing any proof of the things you claimed about the Ho 229.  I'm starting to see a pattern here...you utterly fail at probably everything you do.  How very sad.


ack-ack

[Guppy35]

i tink it wood b kool 2 hav cuz id lokes so perdy and loke da germens used it n ww2!!!




(Image removed from quote.)

Yeah!  Erich Hartmann flew those planes.  It has to have been from WW2.  Nice find Larry!

[Rich46yo]

How about a Korea era arena?

Most of the late war WW-ll stuff still flew in Korea and we could fly the ultimate prop jobs as well as the new Jets.

[Fianna]

He's actually kind of right.


http://www.wingweb.co.uk/aircraft/F-86_Sabre_Part1.html

This is from a quick google search... I'm sure more evidence could be dug up if you invested the time.

Although the FJ-1's appearance didn't suggest it, the fighter leveraged heavily off P-51 technology, particularly in the design of its wing.

The original NA-140 / XP-86 design strongly resembled the NA-134 / XFJ-1. It had straight wings, the same J35 engine, and the same fit of six Browning machine guns.

The XP-86's relationship to the FJ-1 Fury was still apparent. The new aircraft had an air intake in the nose, straddled by three 12.7 millimeter Browning guns on each side, with a high-sitting plexiglas bubble canopy that slid backwards to open.

Both the Sabre and the Mustang were designed by North American. It would make sense for them to implement the successful design features of the Mustang into later aircraft.

[MachFly]

Just think about it, how can a piston and a jet engine fighter be alike?

The only thing that looks the same is the canopy.

[BnZs]

I've fooled with the F-86 a little in another sim...if it was accurately modeled, that airplane is SWEET to fly. Think the kind of handling our P-51D has without torque and a faster roll rate.

[Enker]

I recently read this book, Sabres over MiG Alley: The F-86 and the Battle for Air Superiority in Korea
by Kenneth P. Werrell, and in the development section of the F-86, they talk about how the P-51 and F-86 were similar...though I cannot remember for the life of me what was talked about, other than the bubble canopy and the laminar-flow wings.