Author Topic: Ord Bunkers  (Read 309 times)

Offline SEraider

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1755
Ord Bunkers
« on: June 01, 2009, 03:34:41 PM »
Concerning the ease of porking ord, I think maybe it is time to make a minor modification to the dexterity of a Ord bunker.  Perhaps we should increase 50% the amount of munitions it takes to pork ord.  If not, here are some alternatives.

*Ord takes 60 minutes to revamp.
*Add 1 more bunker to small and large fields only.
*Add autogun or soft gun on top of ord bunker to adequately defend the asset.

What does HT and the community think?
* I am the embodiment of Rule #14
* History is only recent.
* Stick and Stones won't break my bones, but names could "hurt" me.

CO Screaming Eagles

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Ord Bunkers
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2009, 06:21:17 PM »
I've always felt it ridiculous than one suicide 190 can take down bombs for an entire base, and anything that can be done to make it more difficult is a step in the right direction.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Ord Bunkers
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2009, 06:21:27 PM »
You can always resupply it. And don't you think ordnance is easy to destroy since it's meant to explode.
However one singe engine fighter should not be able to destroy it.

that is a good idea.

*Add autogun or soft gun on top of ord bunker to adequately defend the asset.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s