Author Topic: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?  (Read 2110 times)

Offline b56

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2009, 09:08:42 AM »
i hope that they will bring back H2H

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2009, 09:45:40 AM »
G6 A/S
G14 A/S
G10

Make it so.

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2009, 09:56:57 AM »
I did a search..... nothing came up....what is H2H?
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2009, 10:27:25 AM »
P-61
B-29
109E-1
190D-11
Me 410
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2009, 10:32:31 AM »
<---crosses fingers for Beaufighter and Buffalo.
- The Flying Circus -

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2009, 10:34:15 AM »
We SERIOUSLY need more Japanese aircraft. The early and mid-war stable is practically non-existent. The A6M2 if out-classed in mid-war, but the A6M5 is a bit too late. The A6M3 is much needed as a gap-filler. It's impossible to call them competitive with the late-war American iron, but the Judy and Jill will at least give them SOMETHING that's survivable as far as strike craft go: (especially in FSO and scenarios) the D3A and B5N are basically target practice. The Ki-67 is wholly inappropriate for early and mid-war, so we need the Betty VERY bad. We also at LEAST need the Oscar. A5M would also be invaluable for "Flying Tiger" setups (the Tigers did NOT fight Zeros, at least not until AFTER they were absorbed into the USAAF).


The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai  never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2009, 10:37:36 AM »
I did a search..... nothing came up....what is H2H?
Head to head.  They were 8 player arenas hosted on players' end.  You could host custom maps and arena settings.  One of the best things about H2H was free-for-all setups on tiny cage maps.  Non stop furballing action.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2009, 12:17:24 PM »

The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai  never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.

Every log and report I've ever seen shows the Tigers engaging: Ki-43s, Ki-27s,  Ki-30s, Ki-21s, and Ki-48s, with a couple references to A5Ms, D3As, G3Ms and G4Ms. Not one mention of the A6M.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2009, 12:46:05 PM »
Every log and report I've ever seen shows the Tigers engaging: Ki-43s, Ki-27s,  Ki-30s, Ki-21s, and Ki-48s, with a couple references to A5Ms, D3As, G3Ms and G4Ms. Not one mention of the A6M.

I also thought the Flying Tigers faced mostly "Nates", which I believe are Ki27s?  Could be wrong might be Ki43s.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2009, 12:55:51 PM »
Ki-27 was the Nate, Ki-43 was the Oscar. The campaign in general was primarily under the IJAAF.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2009, 01:23:25 PM »

The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai  never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.

The 1st AVG did not engage any Japanese Zeros while the Flying Tigers were an independent (of the USAAF) fighting force.  China did send some Zeros (about 15) to help quelch the growing Chinese resistance but those Zeros were withdrawn from China by December 1940 since by that time the Zeros accomplished what they were sent out to do, crush the Chinese air resistance over the front lines.

The AVG, as noted by others in this thread, did encounter the Ki-43 "Oscar" which was basically the IJAAF's version of the Zero, built to similiar specs though the Oscar was more lightweight and even less rugged than the Zero.  It also didn't have cannons like the Zero.  The air war over China for Japan was also mostly a IJAAF affair with some assistance from the IJN air units from time to time.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2009, 01:31:11 PM »
Oh and we might be given back the H2H (although probably only for subscribers).
I would subscribe for the first time ever if H2H came back from the basement of HTC's office :D
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2009, 01:53:43 PM »
Ki-27 was the Nate, Ki-43 was the Oscar. The campaign in general was primarily under the IJAAF.

Well all I can tell you is I knew Dick Rossi and other Flying Tigers that lived in my area. I had on many occasions spoke with Mr's Rossi about his days in the Tigers. Now wheather any Zeros were claimed is one thing but I was told that they were encountered. I also did some research on the subject and there are conflicting reports about zeros being in the area that the Tigers operated in . There defiantly were Zeros in China during the Flying Tiger days but as stated the reports are conflicting. All the occasions that I spoke to Dick his mind was lucid and he was able to recall very small details about his days with them. Some were about Pappy Boyington that were very enlightening.

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2009, 01:57:47 PM »
The 1st AVG did not engage any Japanese Zeros while the Flying Tigers were an independent (of the USAAF) fighting force.  China did send some Zeros (about 15) to help quelch the growing Chinese resistance but those Zeros were withdrawn from China by December 1940 since by that time the Zeros accomplished what they were sent out to do, crush the Chinese air resistance over the front lines.

The AVG, as noted by others in this thread, did encounter the Ki-43 "Oscar" which was basically the IJAAF's version of the Zero, built to similiar specs though the Oscar was more lightweight and even less rugged than the Zero.  It also didn't have cannons like the Zero.  The air war over China for Japan was also mostly a IJAAF affair with some assistance from the IJN air units from time to time.


ack-ack


Here is a bit of reading that may shed a little light




The key missing piece is the origin and mission of the found/restored Tainan Kokutai Zero. What was a Zero doing in the area north of Hainan Island. This is supplied by Hata/Izawa: On November 22 a composite fighter squadron attached to the 22nd Air Flotilla HQ was created to support the Singapore operation. Fourteen A6M2s (model 21) of the Tainan Air Group and another 13 A6M2 (21) of the 3rd Air Group departed Tainan and Takao airfields for Saigon via Hainan Island on November 26 and 27. They arrived at Soc Trang, about 150 miles south of Saigon on December 1, 1941. 'En route to their destination, however, two Zero fighters had to make emergency landings on Luichow Peninsula because of foul weather, and two pilots were missing in action.' Page 143-144 of Hata/Izawa.

Now the Luichow Peninsula is the bit that sticks out towards Hainan Island and is due south from Kweilin by about 150-200 miles. The peninsula was not held by the Japanese in 1940-1941, they occupied it during the Ichi-Go operation to drive out the bombers at Kweilin. I still don't know where Teitsan is as it's not on any of my old maps, but from Neumann's own words it must be near the beach opposite Hainan Island on the Luichow peninsula.

There are alot of matches between this story in Hata/Izawa, the info in Mikesh on 1940-1941 Zero operations in China, and in Neumann's story. Right IJNAF air group is involved - Tainan. Which we know from the picture of the Zero being re-reconstucted at Kweilin in Mikesh. Right model - A6M2 model 21. The folding wing tips are seen in the Kweilin picture and others. The Serial number (3372) checks out to a A6M2 model 21. Right area - in proximity to Kweilin. Hata/Izawa and Neumann agree on this point. Mikesh might too if I could find Teitsan on a map. Right kind of landing to produce a relatively undamaged airplane. Hata/Izawa state two A6M2s made a forced landing, Neumann gives more detail adding they or it landed on a beach opposite Hainan. The photo in Mikesh of the Zero at Kweilin shows an undamaged drop tank attached to the rack so I doubt the plane landed wheels up.

More than one airplane is involved so Neumann would have extra parts to file. Hata/Izawa report two missing Zeros not the "MANY ZEROS" cited, but I will return to this point later. Not exactly the right date according to my memory of the post on 'Prizes of War' (Phil Butler) - On or just before December 1, 1941 according to Hata/Izawa not Feb. 1, 1941, from Butler but the quote of Butler, if accruate, contains other errors. The December 1941 date certainly puts the Zeros on the ground and abandoned long enough for the locals to cut up the tires and the planes to become unservicable.

Neither aircraft was lost to enemy action - no AVG shooting down Zeros here. The unit was on a ferry flight to French Indo-China and not involved in operations over China. Which fits with what we know of the historical record. What about the comment attributed to Chennault about the 5-6 Zeros shot down over the last 6-9 months prior to October 1942? What, then about the 'MANY ZEROS' used in the reconstruction and the reference to the aircraft not being mass produced and parts needing filing to fit?

The Japanese lost three planes (Hata/Izawa say 3 or 4) to ground fire in China by September 1941. One, the Chendgu Zero, shot down in May? 1941 must have been in pretty good shape for the Chinese made some good drawings of the plane (absent the tail, which was absent). This same plane was the source of an analysis by the US Naval Attache. These three (or 4) were part of the pre-production group of 15 sent to China for combat tests. These were not mass produced airframes. Now you have five possibly six Zeros to incorporate into the rebuild. Three maybe four of which were shot down, by AA. It may be impossible to completely disprove, but so far I do not see any evidence that proves the AVG shot down A6M2s or otherwise encountered them in combat over China prior to October 1942.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: nathan sturman
Subject: Zero absence

Mr Ford,

I have found through a bit of research in the Japanese language accounts here (Akimoto and others' articles) that you are right. In fact, in "the Zero in Mainland China" section of the Maru Mekanik Zero edition (not handy now) it is stated that the first Zero unit back into China was based at Haikou in Hainan in Oct 43, together with some Kates, for air defense, with another unit arriving at Sanai, Hainan, in feb 44. Some airfcraft were detached to the lower Yangzi for collective air defense. And a unit was based at Shanghai's Longhua airport at about that time. The account starts with "although the Zero was absent from Chinese airspace during the first part of the war...."

Thought you would like to know, I'll send the pagination if you haven't yet seen it.

Your work is very good...and interesting. Check on the bit about CAMCO's having built the Hawk IIIs and IIs, I suspect they outfitted the ships and repaired them only. Very few new aircraft were successfully built in China at that time. (The Fuxing stand almost alone.) The factory was bombed before the CW fighter could go into production, one of many clever schemes that went sour on the Chinese. As for Soviet AF in China, they hit Hsinch'u, Taiwan, and were very important for awhile. They left in disgust I understand.

Yours Sincerely,
Nate Sturman
Gunma, Japan

Later:

This replaces what I wrote yesterday, which was off the top of my head: Here is what Akimoto Minoru writes in Maru Meka Zero book:

China mainland:

The Zero wasn't very active here duing the first part of the war, after the navy moved out. But in may of 1943, due to allied air raids, 9 Zeros were depatched to San Ya, Hainan island. These flew cooperative air defense in the Hainan/Canton area. Then on the Oct 1st, 1943 the 254th Wing was formed for air defense activities in the Hainan-Canton vicinity, and based at Haikou, Hainan Island. It was comprised of 24 Zeros and four Carrier Attack planes. (Kates). A detachment of its aircraft were posted to the Yangzi area to participate in joint air defense.

In February of 1944, the 256th (Air Defense) Unit was formed at Shanghai Longhua Airfield, with 24 Zeros and 8 Carrier Attack planes, (probably Kates).

And still later:

The account about the Zeros moving back into the Chinese area in late 43/early44 is in Gunyou Ki Meka Siriiz Vol. 5, Zero Sen, Hardcover, in English, listed as Mechanic of World Aircraft, Kojinsha, Tokyo (Tel 03-3265-1864, don't dial that first zero from abroad).
    ADVERTISEMENTS
 See the Warbird's Bookshelf
Best Sellers - Flying Tigers
Piper Cub - Brewster Buffalo A6M Zero - Flying Wings

 
Flying Tigers: the history
The Smithsonian Institution Press edition went through seven printings from 1991 to 2001. Now Flying Tigers is available again, revised and updated, from HarperCollins. Find it at Amazon websites in the United States - Britain - France - Germany - Japan - and Canada
Or I'll send an autographed copy for list price plus shipping:

$18.95 US Media Mail
$22.95 US Priority Mail
$29.95 International Mail
PayPal rolls your credit card; I fill the order. You can also write a check. If all else fails, send email and we'll work something out.

also by Dan Ford

Remains: a story of the Flying Tigers (the novel)


The Lady & the Tigers (Olga Greenlaw's 1942 account)
Google links
 

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: Any Rumours on what is coming in the future?
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2009, 03:41:11 PM »
heard we are getting a spit VII and a spit XII.
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)