just curious of those who oppose this,what negative affect would it have on your personal gameplay ?
after all if its an "option" it means you have a choice..so why would it bother you.
unless of course you are a armchair general and dont feel secure about the thought of people taking the time to plan missions and carry them out covertly.
I thought the point of the wish was from an "armchair general and don't feel secure about the thought of people taking the time to plan missions and carry them out covertly"
Seems every failed mission is because of "Spiez11!!"
How often do missions actually fail? How often are missions met
FAR from the base they are hitting?
How many have run across a mission taking off or flying by randomly?
More information is better. Seeing where friendly cons are helps one to decide whether to fly in an area or not. Looking for a big, congested fight? Go where all the cons are smooshed close to each other.
Base being hit? Is anyone up defending? Are enough up defending? Etc.
As has been stated time and time again in threads about NOE raids or Hords, if you really don't want to fight anyone, why are you playing an on-line game with hundreds of others?
There are many reasons a mission gets squashed. Spiez!!1! are probably the least of them.
wrongway