Author Topic: Me 262 Swallows  (Read 8230 times)

Offline Nisky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2009, 01:16:41 PM »
Great work Fencer Green 2 is my fav skin thx for your hard work.  :salute
just talk about random stuff but please stay on topic

Recently Touched By The Noodle! ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER!
Pastafarian for life

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4677
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2009, 01:47:03 PM »
The 'razzle dazzle' paint on Green 2 is real beautiful, how hard was it to skin?

Thanks All.

Worst part was getting the Nacelles to line up as they fold in, then the moveable control surfaces were a real pain.  The upper spine and nose wasn't too bad.  Its offically a "Tortise" scheme.  I was waiting for one of the Luftwaffe 'Experts' to protest that this was usually only found on A2s...  ;)  Fortunately I got pictures actual pics of it with all 4 cannon installed.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6166
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2009, 07:02:36 PM »
:x
[/quote

I did the same thing.     :rofl              :x
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #18 on: July 04, 2009, 08:54:57 PM »
 :O  :aok

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4168
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2009, 12:13:41 PM »
Both look great but love the 2nd one, will be my skin of choice for the 262

Offline Stampf

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11491
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2009, 02:52:29 PM »
Awesome job!
- Der Wander Zirkus -
- La Fabrica de Exitos -

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #21 on: July 14, 2009, 02:58:15 PM »
I thought that "squiggle" camo was used primarily on night fighters and night bombers. Is it appropriate for AH's version of the 262?

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #22 on: July 14, 2009, 03:12:39 PM »
Nice work, bro  :aok

 :salute

One thing, though..............

Did you forget to lock-up the paint thinner in the cabinet again?  Sounds like someone has gotten into it and has been doing some sniffing .........

 :noid
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4677
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #23 on: July 14, 2009, 03:40:42 PM »
I thought that "squiggle" camo was used primarily on night fighters and night bombers. Is it appropriate for AH's version of the 262?

Ahh the exact comment I was expecting from the exact person I was expecting it from.

Thanks All.

Worst part was getting the Nacelles to line up as they fold in, then the moveable control surfaces were a real pain.  The upper spine and nose wasn't too bad.  Its offically a "Tortise" scheme.  I was waiting for one of the Luftwaffe 'Experts' to protest that this was usually only found on A2s...  ;)  Fortunately I got pictures actual pics of it with all 4 cannon installed.





Just because you can post, does not mean you should.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #24 on: July 14, 2009, 04:07:51 PM »
Ahh the exact comment I was expecting from the exact person I was expecting it from.

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

Just because you can post, does not mean you should.


 :lol Talk about preperation. ;)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #25 on: July 14, 2009, 08:43:58 PM »
A simple "yes" would have sufficed. No need to be snippy.

Edit: And I read the initial page, skimmed the second, so I missed your comment.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2009, 08:45:34 PM by Krusty »

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6398
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #26 on: July 14, 2009, 09:37:58 PM »
A simple "yes" would have sufficed


No it wouldn't've.  :)
-=Most Wanted=-
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


||||||||

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #27 on: July 14, 2009, 09:47:13 PM »
Great Skins Fencer, you are one of the people who makes this game better and better :salute
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4677
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2009, 10:10:03 AM »
A simple "yes" would have sufficed. No need to be snippy.

No it would not have. 

I know you having watched you bounce around the forums spouting "facts" for the last few years.  That is why I was sure you would make that comment, and why I had scanned those in and was prepared.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: Me 262 Swallows
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2009, 12:30:54 PM »
Prior
Proper
Planning
Prevents
Piss
Poor
Performance

Give that man a cigar  :aok
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.