Torque effect increasing for a single engine aircraft with flaps makes sense. But why does the B-26's torque effect increase with flaps? The Port engine would throw most of the prop blast down and away from the aircraft. While the starboard engine would really give that right-waist gunner a hard time. How do you light a smoke with a 200+ mph prop blast coming in through that right gunner's window?
As for the F6F vs. F4U bit, here's the skinny I got from Zeno's page and films.
F6F:
Hardly torqued on takeoff
Lifted off (combat weight) at around 80mph with NO flaps
Very gentile stall
Trim settings for takeoff:
Elevator: 0 Aileron: 0 Rudder: 1.5º right
F4U:
Torqued like a monster on takeoff
Lifted off (combat weight) at around 100 mph with NO flaps.
Very nasty stall, with a possible incipiant spin.
Trim settings for takeoff:
Elevator: 1º up Aileron: 6º right wing down Rudder: 6º right
See? In these respects the two flight models seem to be switched. You've proved flaps are really screwed up, and that the Corsair is FUBARed. Now if we could only get this fixed too.
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum9/HTML/001322.html Here's the link to the info I posted on the possible switcheroo with the FMs.
-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta 6's Flight School"For yay did the sky darken, and split open and spew forth fire, and
through the smoke rode the Four Wurgers of the Apocalypse.
And on their canopies was tattooed the number of the Beast, and the
number was 190." Jedi, Verse Five, Capter Two, The Book of Dweeb