Author Topic: Name This Plane (54)  (Read 580 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This Plane (54)
« on: January 20, 2001, 11:23:00 AM »
???

   


Brady

------------------
 

[This message has been edited by brady (edited 01-20-2001).]

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2001, 11:28:00 AM »

Ki-44?

if not Ki-84

Offline M.C.202

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2001, 03:17:00 PM »
Ki-44-II (c?)
1,520hp take-off
if a "c", four 20mm cannon
if a "b", four 12.7mgs
good climb, o.k.speed, o.k.roll, turns not so hot.

------------------
M.C.202
Dino in Reno

Offline Suave1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2001, 03:53:00 PM »
SHOKI !

Offline Jimdandy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2001, 11:00:00 PM »
Yep it be one of them there Nakajima Ki-44IIb Shoki. I think it would make a great addition to the standard Japanese plane set. You could have the perked Ki-44IIc version with two 12.7mm and two 40mm. I would also like to see the Kawasaki Ki-100. Kawasaki lets the good time roll.   The Nakajima Ki-43-IIb Hayabusa would be a fun addition to the standard Japanese plane set. It wasn't well armed or fast but it could turn like mad.

Offline bolillo_loco

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2001, 12:10:00 AM »
what the japanese had planes other than the zero? everybody keeps saying that the P-38 did fine in the pacific cause it went up against the slow zero. not planes that did 360-390 mph at 15,000ft performance equal to 109 and 190s. hum

funked

  • Guest
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2001, 01:51:00 AM »
Geezus pollo loco would you just go away with your single endlessly repeated note?

Offline M.C.202

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2001, 03:11:00 AM »
> ...with your single endlessly repeated note?


At least its in a key other than FW :-)
We all have our wants, I want early war, and game support for the....na, thats an old whine. :-)


A big yes on the Ki-100 and Oscar.


How about the Ki43-IIIb as a perk :-)
Stronger wing, 1,250hp, pilot armor and self-sealing tanks, two 20mm cannon in the
cowl. 363mph, 3,400 climb.


------------------
M.C.202
Dino in Reno

[This message has been edited by M.C.202 (edited 01-21-2001).]

Offline M.C.202

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2001, 03:16:00 AM »
sorry, double post.


[This message has been edited by M.C.202 (edited 01-21-2001).]

Offline bolillo_loco

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2001, 03:20:00 AM »
thats pollito not pollo.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This Plane (54)
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2001, 01:49:00 PM »
 Ki 44 it is, the 40mm weapon was not perk worthy it was almost impossible to hit with due to it's short range and appalling ballistic characteristics.

Brady

------------------
 

[This message has been edited by brady (edited 01-21-2001).]