Author Topic: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)  (Read 5939 times)

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7255
Re: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)
« Reply #45 on: June 13, 2023, 10:14:40 AM »
Rumors of my demise were greatly exaggerated. Cancer did not get me.
:eek:

Glad you're better Hilts :salute
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline drgondog

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)
« Reply #46 on: June 16, 2023, 09:55:31 AM »
Well, here is the flight test in July 1944 to evaluate 44-1 at 3000/70"MP.

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-38/p-38-28392.html

Top Speed = 419mph at 19.8K, at limit speed 26,800 RPM for Turbo. 3000RPM @70" MP.

At critical alttude of 24K top speed was 413mph at 60"MP

The primary advatage was a higher rate of climb  with a corresponding trade off of a.)  lower speed at escort altitudes, b.) lower ceiling and c.) lower critical altitude.

There NEVER was a 20-25mph increase in top speed for the jump between 130 and 150 octane. Additionally the usual 10-15mph boost of top speeds (17mph in above report) came with a corresponding lower critical altitude. The issue for the P-38 was the turbo limits.  Note also that the P-38J-15 for this test was flown in clean (no wing pylons) condition - as most P-38 tests were flown compared to P-51 testing, where most, including the associated 44-1 flight tests were flwn with racks - a 12mph drag penalty but inclusive of all ETO/MTO escort conditions.

Also - the 'potential horsepower available' for each succeeding model was never the issue - it was always the intercooler and turbo issues - not to mention the poor quality 'leaking' ducting design which seems to be mentioned in nearly every P-38 flight test I have seen when 'issues' are discused. Life followed art as that was a constant maintenance write up in ETO
Nicholas Boileau "Honor is like an island, rugged and without shores; once we have left it, we can never return"

Offline drgondog

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)
« Reply #47 on: June 16, 2023, 10:16:57 AM »
Another bump of this ancient thread, but since you guys speak of the 479th I thought it would be interesting to mention that the 479th P38s likely operated with 150 octane fuel. This would have allowed them to use 65-75 inches manifold over the standard 60 inches, giving the P38 a 20-25mph speed boost at max power.

They were operating at 70"MP from July forward in ETO, IIRC 9th AF didn't switch until November-December. There was no increase of 20-25mph as the turbo rpm was the limiting factor - not to mention the drag rise due to lower Mcrit of the P-38


From the page below, the 479th operated at Station 377 Wattisham, England from 15 May 1944 - 23 November 1945. They converted from P38s to P51s in the time period between October-December 1944.
 
The 479th first 'mixed bag' meeting was escort on disastrous Sept 27 Kassel mission where 445th was clobbered. Olds was on that mission and called to testify at the investigaion board afterwards. 

Now in the second document, you see 150 octane fuel deliveries starting June 10th, 1944 to Station 377 (Wattisham), at least 4 months before their conversion to P51s began. Meaning they probably had 4-6 month operating time with P38s while being supplied with 150 octane fuel.

Quibbling but ~ 3 1/2 mo. The transition began in early September, first combat with mix was either Sept 26th or 27th.

Anyways yeah I just thought this was interesting, since many people believe P38s were only tested for 150 octane use and never used in combat with it.

All three (P-38, P-47, P-51) were cleared in April 1944 by Materiel Command, all three were operational in ETO (8thAF at 3" below MC authorization in late June 1944.
 

VIII Air Technical Services lowered the US fight test ceiling for permissible 5 minute limit (continuous) boost for 150 octane fuel.
Nicholas Boileau "Honor is like an island, rugged and without shores; once we have left it, we can never return"

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1512
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
Re: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)
« Reply #48 on: September 14, 2023, 03:56:17 AM »
i remember reading somewhere that cost of p38 in terms of build as well as maintenance was prohibitive when compared with P51. For all it's advantages, cost did not justify them.

 

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15462
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Interesting reading about P-38s (long)
« Reply #49 on: September 14, 2023, 11:58:58 AM »
The P-51 was excellent in terms of cost/performance.  It was one of the less-expensive US fighters.

Fighter costs in 1944 (Air Technical Service Command, Budget and Fiscal Office, http://www.au.af.mil/au/afhra/aafsd/aafsd_pdf/t082.pdf):

P-38, $97,000
P-47, $86,000
P-51, $52,000
P-39, $51,000
P-40, $45,000

From America's Hundred Thousand, by Dean, p. 520 (1944 F4U-1D):

F4U, $75,000

Supposedly from A History of the United States Air Force 1907-1957, Alfred Goldberg, editor or from Victory Roll, by William Wolf:

F6F, $63,000
FM2, $50,000