Author Topic: NEW QUOTE PLEASE  (Read 2833 times)

Offline swoose

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2009, 12:53:17 PM »
Where facts are few....experts are many.

You can't fix stupid!

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27348
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2009, 12:55:21 PM »
Them red fellers are lower 'an a snakes belly in a wagon rut.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline A8Jaraxl

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #47 on: August 10, 2009, 12:58:25 PM »
One for any fellow Vets/Active duty out there.


"A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life." That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand that."

~UNKNOWN

Offline Nutzoid

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2009, 01:03:36 PM »
Nevaaaa, In thaaa history of man kind, As such a whine , been made, about so little.

HiTech


 :rofl
C co. 1st Bn 7 CAV 1st Cav Div  " Garry Owen"

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #49 on: August 10, 2009, 01:04:09 PM »
"We are working on it, go ice your taint"
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #50 on: August 10, 2009, 03:35:09 PM »
"A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life." That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand that."

~UNKNOWN

I've never really liked that one, because it exclude quite a bit of people. Those who didn't fight and never planned to fight should still be considered Veterans, I think. Though my father flew Hueys and fits that description perfectly, my mother was a social worker and put up with all sorts of hell from people trying to dodge. She deserves recognition too, I think...and I've met a couple people that use quotes like that to say that her service doesn't include her as a veteran.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline 1MADDOG1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1310
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #51 on: August 10, 2009, 03:37:48 PM »
I've never really liked that one, because it exclude quite a bit of people. Those who didn't fight and never planned to fight should still be considered Veterans, I think. Though my father flew Hueys and fits that description perfectly, my mother was a social worker and put up with all sorts of hell from people trying to dodge. She deserves recognition too, I think...and I've met a couple people that use quotes like that to say that her service doesn't include her as a veteran.

If you are or would have served, you would understand a whole lot better.
:old: SM1/E-6 USN 1980-1991 (100% Disabled Vet) Served on FFG-11, FFG-13, FF-1047, LHD-1, HC-16, NAS Pensacola (Navy Police)
Multi AHXARL Season & Finale Champion, Having Fun Since Tour #76
I'm also PorkyPig, SwynFlew, & Ruger

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #52 on: August 10, 2009, 03:40:36 PM »
I understand it, I just don't think it's a decent way of thinking.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #53 on: August 10, 2009, 03:43:22 PM »
One of my favorite cam from Mark Priby, AKA Snail. As he was simulating a typical Warbirds Player.

"This game sucks, I quit and am never playing again, Maverick, what field are you at?"


HiTech




Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #54 on: August 10, 2009, 03:44:36 PM »
I've actually heard that one range vox in the MA before...in fact, I think that was back during the transition to AHII. :lol
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27348
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #55 on: August 10, 2009, 05:12:26 PM »
One of my favorite cam from Mark Priby, AKA Snail. As he was simulating a typical Warbirds Player.

"This game sucks, I quit and am never playing again, Maverick, what field are you at?"


HiTech




DOH!   :lol
« Last Edit: August 10, 2009, 05:16:49 PM by Shuffler »
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline A8Jaraxl

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #56 on: August 10, 2009, 06:02:40 PM »
I've never really liked that one, because it exclude quite a bit of people. Those who didn't fight and never planned to fight should still be considered Veterans, I think. Though my father flew Hueys and fits that description perfectly, my mother was a social worker and put up with all sorts of hell from people trying to dodge. She deserves recognition too, I think...and I've met a couple people that use quotes like that to say that her service doesn't include her as a veteran.

No one is saying she does not deserve recognition for the work she does. But, the truth is she is NOT a Vet of the US Armed Forces. Social Service is not a military or para military organization. This would be like asking us to make Steel Workers Vets because they risked their lives 2000ft above the ground working steel. While this is a dangerous job and indeed requires them to "put up with a great deal of peoples crap" it is NOT military service.  While it should gather its respective recognition, trying to pool nonmilitary occupations in the same lump as military is a futile effort. There is so much more to the Military then anyone could ever understand unless you where there yourself. If you never served, you simply have second hand knowledge which is subjective at best.

This is a quote about "Vets" ie those that served in the US Armed Forces. U.S. Army, Navy, Airforce, Marines, Coast Guard, Spec-Ops, Federal Service. Last I checked Social Service while an honorable and respected occupation is not in that list. So NO, she is not a "VET" both by letter of the "law" and by simple process of elimination. Why is it that a quote on a specific subject must be criticized because it did not include everyone? Your responce is exactly what this quote is talking about. You mother is NOT fighting, chose NOT to fight, as much as women are allowed these days, yet she should get the same recognition as those that went willingly into harms way? If you think putting up with peoples "crap" and the hell that creates is what we are talking about in honoring our vets, you need to take a step back, take off the rose colored glasses and look again. Your mother works a JOB, one in which she can quit without reprisal at any time. She is not sent into combat zones, not required to live her life 24/7 by the standards of the Federal Government and Department of Defense. There is no comparison.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2009, 06:05:10 PM by A8Jaraxl »

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #57 on: August 10, 2009, 06:21:13 PM »
The difference between a steel worker and my mother would be that she went through Basic and other training programs, had a serial number, and wore a US Army uniform. She worked on-base, just as "regulated" as anybody else. Sure, she wasn't put through hell and didn't necessarily risk her life for her country, but she wasn't allowed to back then either...so that point's a bit moot.

I personally think if you don the uniform, serve your country and its war effort, and are honorably discharged, you ought to be recognized as a Veteran. Your opinion, of course, is up to you.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2009, 06:23:56 PM by OOZ662 »
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline A8Jaraxl

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #58 on: August 10, 2009, 06:48:17 PM »
The difference between a steel worker and my mother would be that she went through Basic and other training programs, had a serial number, and wore a US Army uniform. She worked on-base, just as "regulated" as anybody else. Sure, she wasn't put through hell and didn't necessarily risk her life for her country, but she wasn't allowed to back then either...so that point's a bit moot.

I personally think if you don the uniform, serve your country and its war effort, and are honorably discharged, you ought to be recognized as a Veteran. Your opinion, of course, is up to you.

Then she was not in Social Service, she was in the US Army. Then she would be a Vet. Unless she did not serve at least 180 active days, reservists are not considered available for "Vet" status until they served 180 active days. Not saying she was a reservist, just mentioning this because it is one of the only standards (along with honorable discharge) that is placed on if you qualify to be a "vet" or not within Military service.
This information would have been good to know in your first statement rather then in a second statement. As it makes it look like you are now backpeddling in order to save face. Social Service and Military Service are two different things. None of this is my opinion. The Federal Goverment clearly defines what a "Vet" is.
You do not have to see "combat or combat operations" to be a Vet. If you did see combat or combat operations for a determined length of time, then you are considered a Combat Vet.

If she indeed wore the uniform and qualified for "vet" status then no one can say she is not a Vet. If she wore the uniform, but did not qualify for "Vet" status then she is not a "vet". There is really no grey area here or opinion about it.


« Last Edit: August 10, 2009, 06:50:08 PM by A8Jaraxl »

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: NEW QUOTE PLEASE
« Reply #59 on: August 10, 2009, 06:59:47 PM »
I'm curious if there's a misunderstanding of terms here. She served in the U.S. Army as a social worker; one whose duty it was to deal with the psychological work involved with people who did things such as shot themselves in the foot to get out or became overly stressed. She served a term throughout the Vietnam War and was honorably discharged. I can't really give you an accurate figure as to how long she served, though. Both of my parents would rather forget it: father through trauma and mother angered at the way she experienced being looked down upon due to the thoughts on the war at the time. I do know it was certainly longer than 180 days, though. Very much so.

I know there's the definition by law, but there's plenty of combat veterans I've encountered that say calling her any kind of a veteran is a "disgrace" to them. They're just too macho about it; maybe they deserve to be, but I don't agree with them.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.