Author Topic: End of an era in the Air Force  (Read 1395 times)

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2009, 01:23:36 PM »
There is a whole mess of tweets at DM but you have to be on the base to see them. They are across the street from the golf course.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2009, 04:51:12 PM »
Saw another one today Mav.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline wrongwayric

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2009, 09:13:34 AM »
So the question is this....can you now buy one? I mean if it's no longer being used by the military could you buy one and have it flying as a piece of military history. Just a thought. Would be sad to just see them waste away in a bone yard or be cut up for scrap.

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2009, 10:02:57 AM »
So the question is this....can you now buy one? I mean if it's no longer being used by the military could you buy one and have it flying as a piece of military history. Just a thought. Would be sad to just see them waste away in a bone yard or be cut up for scrap.


Absolutely

u
gotta bid on it


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2009, 11:00:46 AM »
Now that would make a fun ride. :cool:
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Roundeye

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #20 on: August 07, 2009, 03:35:32 PM »
 :salute 6,000 pound dog whistle :salute
"Rotorhed"

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #21 on: August 07, 2009, 04:07:54 PM »
I enjoyed flying the tweet.  Just a bit shy of 1000 hrs in them.  It was a great primary trainer, forgiving and very teachable.  You could really let a student go out and make mistakes in them that would tear the new T-6 apart.

I'll miss them, even though they were loud enough to cause permanent hearing damage.  It's a shame they weren't modernized/rebuilt or the basic concept recycled into new-build aircraft.  The T-6 just doesn't hold a candle to the T-37's overall value/utility IMHO.



Hey Eagle,

Did the tweets have full aerobatic capabililty or was it limited? Just curious.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Russian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2992
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #22 on: August 07, 2009, 05:36:57 PM »
Hey Eagle,

Did the tweets have full aerobatic capabililty or was it limited? Just curious.

All planes have limitations.  I have no idea about Tweet, but T-6 has 15 sec max being inverted.

Offline mensa180

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4010
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #23 on: August 07, 2009, 06:00:24 PM »
Toad is the guy to talk to about T38s.
inactive
80th FS "Headhunters"
Public Relations Officer

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #24 on: August 07, 2009, 06:08:01 PM »
All planes have limitations.  I have no idea about Tweet, but T-6 has 15 sec max being inverted.

Wow capt obvious. Nice non answer there.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #25 on: August 07, 2009, 09:58:38 PM »
Hey Eagle,

Did the tweets have full aerobatic capabililty or was it limited? Just curious.

Full aerobatic, stressed to positive 6.67 and negative 2.5 (if I recall correctly... maybe it was neg 4, can't remember).  We added a prohibition against intentional negative-G flight due to the age of the oil system and potential for temporarily starving the engine of oil, and snap rolls were prohibited due to the violence of the maneuver depending on entry speed.  But otherwise fully aerobatic and incredibly predictable.

I think the negative G flight limit was 30 seconds because that's how much fuel the inverted reservoir would hold.

I was doing a little "follow the leader" maneuvering against another IP in a second T-37 (technically it was our "extended trail" exercise but we flew more aggressively when it was just instructors in the planes) and at one point, I found myself inverted with very low airspeed and with the other guy about 1000 ft behind me.  Knowing that our flight paths could not intersect due to the geometry of the situation, I thought I'd give him a little suprise.  I gently pulled the plane almost into the stall (an experienced pilot can feel this by varying amounts of airframe buffeting) and nudged just a tiny bit of rudder to get the nose rotating.  I let the plane rotate 180 degrees and halted the rotation by easing off on the stick and applying opposite rudder, still inverted and doing only about 60 knots.  It wasn't a tail slide or anything prohibited, but because of the geometry of the maneuver I was inverted, still climbing with positive G's, with essentially no forward airspeed and drifting away from the other plane, but I was pointed right at him.  It shocked him so much that since he was also very near the stall, his instinctive twitch on the controls sent him into an impending spin entry.  Since I was still fully under control, I was able to flop right down onto his 6 as he fluttered on past.  Of course that sort of position change isn't allowed under the "extended trail" exercise, so we knocked it off and set up another exercise :)  Good clean fun, within the rules/regulations, something we did to improve our mastery of the plane and make us better instructors.

My point is that the plane was a joy to fly especially once you figured out exactly how much the plane would give you and where it would bite you in the butt.  We taught the students to fly in the center of the envelope and how to recover back to the center if they went out of control, but as instructors we could go out and explore the WHOLE envelope because the plane was so durable and forgiving.  The T-6, not so much...  If you try to do that with a T-6 the prop would probably fall off or something else yet equally disastrous would happen.

« Last Edit: August 07, 2009, 10:03:15 PM by eagl »
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Buzzard7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #26 on: August 07, 2009, 11:36:58 PM »
Be interesting to see what they will come up with to replace the white rocket with wings. The C model 38 is definitely not the A model my father flew as an IP.

A tweet as a private plane would be a ton of fun. Anyone know the range with external fuel?

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #27 on: August 08, 2009, 06:40:54 AM »
As I recall, it is not easy on fuel. 

With the wing tip tanks (T-37C), I think the range was right at, or just over, 1,000 miles and without wing tip tanks it was around 450,...460miles. 

Trying to dust off the memories here, but I seem to recall the fuel burn rate at around 150 to 160 GPH.

Eagl, you have a more recent history of with the plane.  Please correct me here as it has been more than a couple of decades for me.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #28 on: August 08, 2009, 09:41:16 AM »
Yea, the T-37 engines were not very efficient and the wing is big/fat, so it gulps fuel.  As has been pointed out many times, the Tweet's main purpose was really to convert jet fuel to noise...

It would hold right around 340 gallons, and at medium-low altitudes it would empty the tanks in somewhat under 2 hours.  If you went up high (20-25k) you could stretch it to a legal 2.5 hour flight with about 20 minutes reserve at 10,000 ft, but realize that's about 2 hours at 20k+ in an unpressurized cockpit, which can lead to the bends or other physiological problems beyond merely being fatiguing.

Med alt cruise was somewhere in the ballpark of 1000-1200 pounds per hour if I recall correctly.  Range could be stretched to over 500 miles at high altitude, depending on winds but a comfortable range for planning was 350-400 miles, with reserves.

NASA put a LOT of money into a whole family of small jet powerplants, with the objective of transitioning light commercial aviation and some high-end private aviation away from piston engine gasoline powerplants.  The result was a wide range of very high quality and relatively "cheap" jet engines, from 300 to 3000 lb thrust.  And they cost "only" about $1 million each, with a time between overhauls over 1000 hrs.  The very light jet industry profited from this in a big way, but we could also have dropped a 1200 or 1500 lb thrust engine into the tweet and given the plane a whole new character.  Those engines just sip fuel and are very reliable, so we'd probably double the endurance while giving the tweet a larger single engine safety margin due to more installed thrust (original motors put out maybe 900lbs once installed).

But they didn't.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2009, 10:18:22 AM by eagl »
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: End of an era in the Air Force
« Reply #29 on: August 08, 2009, 09:49:14 AM »
There's an outfit who is working on a mod to the Paris Jet to use a single JT-15D (Citation 500 series/Beechjet/T-1 the AF already operates) instead of the 2 fuel suckers installed on it.

Seeing the inside of the engine compartment I couldn't imagine a Tweet would be much different to do something similar and the AF has lots of experience maintaining the Pratt JT-15D on the T1.  I'd rather be in front of a single JT-15D than behind a single PT-6 personally.  I also imagine that some of the Williams engines used on the CJ series of airplanes would do even better than the Pratt in terms of fuel economy.  Shame to see the airplanes parked. :(