Author Topic: Hudson Crash  (Read 400 times)

Offline CHAPPY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
Hudson Crash
« on: August 10, 2009, 09:07:55 AM »
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_mid_air_collision_crowded_airspace

So in this case who has the right of way, the plane or the copter?

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 09:51:35 AM »
The more maneuverable aircraft always yields to the lesser... so in this case the helicopter yields. A bit of a moot point when they don't see each other.
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline Casca

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 10:23:21 AM »
FAR 91.113, the controlling regulation, is silent with respect to airplane vs. rotorcraft.  The less manueverable categories are specified in the case of balloon, glider and airship as well as aircraft towing or refueling.  An airplane and rotorcraft would be expected to comport with the positional right-of-way rules.  These are:

(e) Approaching head-on. When aircraft are approaching each other head-on, or nearly so, each pilot of each aircraft shall alter course to the right.

(f) Overtaking. Each aircraft that is being overtaken has the right-of-way and each pilot of an overtaking aircraft shall alter course to the right to pass well clear.

(g) Landing. Aircraft, while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force an aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed and is attempting to make way for an aircraft on final approach. When two or more aircraft are approaching an airport for the purpose of landing, the aircraft at the lower altitude has the right-of-way, but it shall not take advantage of this rule to cut in front of another which is on final approach to land or to overtake that aircraft.

I'm Casca and I approved this message.

Offline trigger2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1342
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2009, 10:56:48 AM »
I don't see why the tour helicopter wasn't IFR. You'd think that when you've got people paying you to fly with you, you'd want flight following, especially in a crowded area like that... IMO, it's the helos blame as they didn't have flight following during a time it is perfectly LOGICAL (I know, since when is there such thing as logic. :D) to have it.

My $.02, and my prayers are with the families that lost loved ones.
Sometimes, we just need to remember what the rules of life really are: You only
need two tools: WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the
WD-40. If it shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape.
*TAs Aerofighters Inc.*

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2009, 10:57:02 AM »
FARs notwithstanding, helicopter pilots are taught (at least I was) to yield to anything you are aware of. Nothing else is going to be able to stop where they are, wherever they are.
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2009, 10:57:28 AM »
Seems the Hudson river is cursed. First the passenger jet, now a helicopter!  :huh
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Axis vs Allies

Offline Casca

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2009, 11:25:28 AM »
FARs notwithstanding, helicopter pilots are taught (at least I was) to yield to anything you are aware of. Nothing else is going to be able to stop where they are, wherever they are.

Just as I was taught in an airplane.  If you see something you get out of the way instead of boring on and counting on 91.113 to take care of it.
I'm Casca and I approved this message.

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2009, 11:29:54 AM »
Casca, forgive me if I'm reading this wrong, but are you suggesting that is what happened? That one aircraft saw the other and expected them to get out of the way?
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline Casca

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2009, 11:38:33 AM »
Casca, forgive me if I'm reading this wrong, but are you suggesting that is what happened? That one aircraft saw the other and expected them to get out of the way?

You are reading it wrong.  I never suggested that.
I'm Casca and I approved this message.

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2009, 12:25:17 PM »
Roger that... sorry. :)
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2009, 12:32:26 PM »
I READ ABOUT this the other night.

 from what i read, the piper hit the helicopter from behind. the chopper pilot had no chance to even see the piper.
 there was an attempt to radio to him, by another pilot on the ground, but for whatever reason it went unheeded.

 the way i read your question, it almost seems as if you're fishing here.....and if i'm wrong, i apologize.......but people died in what appears to be a freak accident.
 
 most probably, the piper pilot failed to see the chopper.....dunno why though. i wasn't there.

 i know people that fly there. one of our club planes suffered an engine failure and went in there a couple of years ago.

ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline CHAPPY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2009, 01:59:19 PM »

 the way i read your question, it almost seems as if you're fishing here.....and if i'm wrong, i apologize.......but people died in what appears to be a freak accident.
 

I am not fishing.
I was just wondering, in that situation who would be at fault by FAA regulations. I know there are a few pilots  that read the BBS that might be able to answer my question.

 :pray
to the familys of those who perished.

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Hudson Crash
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2009, 02:08:46 PM »
It sounds like a very unique circumstance, one which I'm sure is going to be heavily reviewed soon. My only city helicopter experience is in Boston, and there, fixed-wing and rotary-wing traffic are kept very separate, not only by route but by altitude as well. If NYC was mixing all those different-speed aircraft into one area like that, then something was bound to happen sooner or later.

Very sad, very unfortunate.
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.