Re arange order of rocket firing

[Motherland]

Nemisis, no offense, but you have about as close to 'zero' combat experience in the game as you can get, and you have no clue what actually entails shooting down a bomber, with their childishly easy to aim and kill with guns. You really shouldn't be trying to argue with people who actually have in game experience.

[Nemisis]

While I admit I have limited fighter experience, I do know bombers. I admit the 20mm in the tail may pose some problems, and more than the 20mm in the Ki-67, but it is not an insurmountable problem. I have first hand experience that no matter how you gun, fighters will shoot you down. Oh, you may kill more attackers some days then others, but when I get jumped by 4 or more, I rarely make it back to friendly air cover. It maybe that my gunning sucks, and I need to improve as not to be an easy kill. But based on what I see when I fly with other bombers, my gunning is average, better than about half, worse than about half as well.

But this is not the thread to put this in. As you have booed my original thread topic, then LET IT DIE. I see no reason to keep something you all are so vehemently opposed to alive.

[Motherland]

You have less than 40 hours of flying time with a grand total of two kills in fighters and like six kills in bombers. The vast majority of your flying time is in bombers. You have absolutely no experience to speak of.
Unless your Gameid is something other than Nemisis, like you claim...

[Nemisis]

40hrs? that dosen't sound right. I did have to get a new account just before Christmas this year. Did you inclued everything before that? I have no idea how you would get it but you may have. I know I have killed at least 15 in my bomber. I know, I'm not much in fighters so far, but what can you expect for how little time I spend it them. If it goes back to before about half way through November then you have the wrong guy.

[Motherland]

Using the Aces High Pilots Statistics program that downloads all its data from the scores pages, running a search through tours 105-115 for GameID Nemisis, I got results for three tours (107, 108, and 111), about 25 (4 in fighters) hours total sortie time, 2 fighter kills and 7 bomber kills. Running up these amazing stats took you 48 fighter sorties and 269 bomber sories, of which you landed 14 and 70 respectively.

[druski85]

Is trying to derail my B-29 thread. No that is not newb, it is awesome. Sorry, but a B-29 won't unbalance the game anymore than the 262 does.

It takes considerable talent to hijack one's own thread.   

But this is not the thread to put this in. As you have booed my original thread topic, then LET IT DIE. I see no reason to keep something you all are so vehemently opposed to alive.

If you admit the change in direction dictates letting the original one die, then perhaps you should not continue to post about b-29s in here.  If you have other rocket requests, by all means...

[Nemisis]

As a matter of fact, I do: I want all MY rockets to be nukes, and all of yours to be duds. I also want them to be 1,000,000,000,000,000 megaton nukes.



 

[trigger2]

As a matter of fact, I do: I want all MY rockets to be nukes, and all of yours to be duds. I also want them to be 1,000,000,000,000,000 megaton nukes.



 

I would like to redirect you to the pictures I originally posted in your b-29 thread.
Thank you.

[Masherbrum]

You forget the fact that with the B-29, with its high alt and high speeds, it would pretty much FORCE any attacker into the twin .50s and the 20mm, making them mince meat...

The 20mm was rarely used as it was unreliable.   However outside of the 262 and 163, by the time you climbed, gained on the 29's, they're almost landing.   357mph level ability is sickening with that payload. 

[Masherbrum]

As a matter of fact, I do: I want all MY rockets to be nukes, and all of yours to be duds. I also want them to be 1,000,000,000,000,000 megaton nukes.



 

Thank God for teenagers.

[Nemisis]

Thank God for teenagers.

In case some of you slower people couldn't tell, I was joking.

[Masherbrum]

In case some of you slower people couldn't tell, I was joking.

As was I. 

[Nemisis]

Sorry masherbrum, I wasn't reffering to you. But your post made me think of that.