« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: 3DMark 2006 Bench  (Read 3954 times)

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2009, 03:05:02 AM »
Quote from: OOZ662 on August 29, 2009, 03:02:49 AM
Looks like it's sitting on a pad. Maybe rubber.

Look at the left side corner it looks like touching the carpet. Not to mention what happens when he touches the board after rubbing his borom socks against the cat fur carpet repeatedly.. He has no chassis to ground himself to for starters.
Logged
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2009, 03:07:58 AM »
I would hope that you could ground yourself on the case of the PSU...though you never know. :uhoh As I read on the other forum, it's a decent quality one, though.
Logged
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Reschke

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7724
      • VF-17 "The Jolly Rogers"
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2009, 08:58:50 AM »
This guy is the perfect candidate for the Antec Skeleton...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129056
Logged
Buckshot
Reschke from March 2001 till tour 146
Founder and CO VF-17 Jolly Rogers September 2002 - December 2006
"I'm baaaaccccckkk!"

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2009, 07:23:00 AM »
Quote from: MrRiplEy[H] on August 29, 2009, 02:45:08 AM
Either you have non-static special full carpeting or you like to live dangerously..  :lol

the latter.  :devil

Quote from: MrRiplEy[H] on August 29, 2009, 03:03:19 AM
On a second look if that power supply has bottom or top ventilation you're also in for a serious fire hazard dood.

rear fan only with vents on all sides, none at top/bottom. i have extinguisher arms length away.  =P

Quote from: OOZ662 on August 29, 2009, 03:07:58 AM
I would hope that you could ground yourself on the case of the PSU...though you never know. :uhoh As I read on the other forum, it's a decent quality one, though.

i read otherwise, these PCP&C 750W "silencers" are the cheaper ones, not like the "quality" more expensive black-colored PCP&C turbo-cools.

Quote from: Reschke on August 29, 2009, 08:58:50 AM
This guy is the perfect candidate for the Antec Skeleton...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129056
was leaning more towards the DD mini-rack.
http://www.dangerden.com/store/mini-torture-rack.html


Prime 95 Blend Test







« Last Edit: August 30, 2009, 07:24:53 AM by skribetm »
Logged

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #19 on: September 02, 2009, 07:04:32 AM »
4.0

Logged

Offline TilDeath

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1199
      • TD Computer Systems
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #20 on: September 02, 2009, 08:59:07 AM »
Oh darn, now I have to get into the 4GHz act here too... will be making an edit here in a few mins.  Time to crank up the 920

EDIT
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 09:37:31 AM by TilDeath »
Logged

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #21 on: September 02, 2009, 03:54:26 PM »
nice clocks td, specially the NB and DDR3 freqs. 4.5 is do-able on that cpu, and on AIR.  ;)

not my run, but here just for reference.  :D

LINK

good luck!  :aok
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 03:56:02 PM by skribetm »
Logged

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17316
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #22 on: September 02, 2009, 04:40:53 PM »
I cant believe that skribetm could not win at minesweeper even with  his puter cranked up all the way to 4k.   :eek:  think its time for a new build :).

semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #23 on: September 02, 2009, 05:03:14 PM »
Quote from: guncrasher on September 02, 2009, 04:40:53 PM
I cant believe that skribetm could not win at minesweeper even with  his puter cranked up all the way to 4k.   :eek:  think its time for a new build :).

semp

hehehe! gonna be a while for my next upgrade..

six core *(edit: DESKTOP) amd
and i wont have to change motherboards too, it's a drop-in AM3/AM2+ part. ;)



http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?102903
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 05:06:56 PM by skribetm »
Logged

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #24 on: September 03, 2009, 12:00:13 AM »
Quote from: skribetm on September 02, 2009, 05:03:14 PM
hehehe! gonna be a while for my next upgrade..

six core *(edit: DESKTOP) amd
and i wont have to change motherboards too, it's a drop-in AM3/AM2+ part. ;)

(Image removed from quote.)

http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?102903

But the question is will it be any faster than an C2D E8500
Logged
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #25 on: September 03, 2009, 02:20:35 AM »
Quote from: MrRiplEy[H] on September 03, 2009, 12:00:13 AM
But the question is will it be any faster than an C2D E8500

"faster" is too vague a term. in superpi where it is highly FPU x87 arch intensive(and code is 15 years outdated), of course it is.
if we talk wprime, E8500 is slower (even when compared to quad cores only). it would depend on your application.
Logged

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #26 on: September 03, 2009, 04:18:10 AM »
Quote from: skribetm on September 03, 2009, 02:20:35 AM
"faster" is too vague a term. in superpi where it is highly FPU x87 arch intensive(and code is 15 years outdated), of course it is.
if we talk wprime, E8500 is slower (even when compared to quad cores only). it would depend on your application.

Let's talk about real world performance and games (1 core utilized..)
Logged
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #27 on: September 03, 2009, 05:31:50 AM »
Quote from: MrRiplEy[H] on September 03, 2009, 04:18:10 AM
Let's talk about real world performance and games (1 core utilized..)

sure we can discuss per core performance and efficiency, as long as you're up to the task of compiling gnu-mp on a vendor-neutral opensource compiler (gcc).
otherwise, lets leave it at this: a smaller-engine ducati bike will get to its "top speed" of 215mph faster than an 8.0 litre W16, 64v DOHC quad-turbocharged Bugatti Veyron.
Logged

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #28 on: September 03, 2009, 05:59:16 AM »
Quote from: skribetm on September 03, 2009, 05:31:50 AM
sure we can discuss per core performance and efficiency, as long as you're up to the task of compiling gnu-mp on a vendor-neutral opensource compiler (gcc).
otherwise, lets leave it at this: a smaller-engine ducati bike will get to its "top speed" of 215mph faster than an 8.0 litre W16, 64v DOHC quad-turbocharged Bugatti Veyron.


Lol what does gnu have to do with real world or especially gaming performance? :) It _is_ AH related discussion afterall.

Ok, *nix does have 0.8% market share granted.  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: September 03, 2009, 06:03:16 AM by MrRiplEy[H] »
Logged
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: 3DMark 2006 Bench
« Reply #29 on: September 03, 2009, 06:23:44 AM »
Quote from: MrRiplEy[H] on September 03, 2009, 05:59:16 AM
Lol what does gnu have to do with real world or especially gaming performance? :) It _is_ AH related discussion afterall.

Ok, *nix does have 0.8% market share granted.  :rolleyes:

i honestly cant tell if you're kidding or you're serious. it seems i'll have to start ignoring your posts, as they are half flame-baiting and half ridiculously uneducated.
in your "real world," yes *nix has 0.8% market share, and the only OS is microsoft, and the only game is AH2. unfortunately, you'll have to look out of your limited perception of reality to objectively evaluate the hardware you are using. ;)

please stop crapping in my thread.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »