Author Topic: WWI bombers maybe???  (Read 1226 times)

Offline jay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #15 on: October 20, 2009, 03:10:16 PM »
ok ok wasnt asking for these bombers in like the very new relaese but amybe later on when WWI planes are more popular and i guess i shouldnt have posted if it was going to get flamed  :noid
"He who makes a beast of himself Gets rid of the pain of being a man." Dr.Johnson


Offline blkmgc

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 940
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2009, 06:19:54 PM »
No worries man. The ones flaming are the same ones flaming every WWI thread out there. Just learn to skip over their posts.  :salute
Debdenboys.comAdministrator

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2009, 07:42:31 PM »
WWI arena will be a dueling arena.....no bombs allowed.

This will be bad...now how will i get kills if there are no bombers!
Strokes

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2009, 08:22:12 PM »
Since none of you other guys are going to say it...





OH THE HUMANITY!!!

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2009, 09:56:59 AM »
I thought about it, decided that it was a bad joke, even for me. :)  :neener:
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline horble

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1274
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #20 on: October 21, 2009, 05:42:21 PM »
Zeppelins were fun in DoA.

Nothing like flying one for 80 miles into the middle of a huge furball  :lol
Kommando Nowotny

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2009, 05:50:40 PM »
Wasn't all Zepps... Gotha G5a...

Not that I want WWI bombers in the new arena... Just don't think they will serve any purpose...
Hell, they served no tangible purpose in the real war...

RC

"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #22 on: October 21, 2009, 07:16:26 PM »
Where'd you get that pic there Denholm was that in the H2H days did you make your own model? :confused:
« Last Edit: October 21, 2009, 07:32:17 PM by bravoa8 »

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #23 on: October 21, 2009, 07:34:06 PM »
Where'd you get that pic there Denholm was that in the H2H days did you make your own model? :confused:

Its called 'photoshop'  :D
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #24 on: October 21, 2009, 07:35:07 PM »

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2009, 12:30:09 PM »
"Not that I want WWI bombers in the new arena... Just don't think they will serve any purpose...
Hell, they served no tangible purpose in the real war..."

Really? The raids on the UK made by airships and aeroplanes led to RFC and RNAS squadrons being withdrawn from the Western front to fly Home Defence against them - and the unification of the RFC and RNAS into the RAF, the world's first dedicated air force separate from the Army and Navy. The RNAS's raids in Handley-Page 0/400s deep behind enemy lines kept the German troops awake when they badly needed sleep too . . .

The biggest killer in WW1 was artillery. If a combat flight sim is to make any pretence at reproducing the WW1 war in the air, it should include effective artillery bombardment and the ability of the two-seaters to direct that bombardment. The BE2c/e, RE8, Rumpler and Albatros C-series two-seaters that took the photos and directed the artillery fire were the primary targets for the lighter single-seater 'scouts' that evolved into the world's first fighters. Fighters then fought fighters so the two-seaters could do their work properly. The whole point of fighter aviation isn't to run up a cricket or baseball score, it's to gain and hold air superiority so the rest of the air force can do its job: in WW1 and in order of priority, photo recce, artillery observation, ground attack and strategic bombing.

Everyone enjoys the odd furball but it ain't the be-all-and-end-all of combat flight sims. The more variety, the better the sim.

Cheers!

« Last Edit: October 23, 2009, 12:31:50 PM by Simba »
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Eric122

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2010, 12:42:04 PM »
+1 for the gotha and zepplin

Offline jay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Re: WWI bombers maybe???
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2010, 12:48:32 PM »
wow bump
"He who makes a beast of himself Gets rid of the pain of being a man." Dr.Johnson