Author Topic: Aircraft errors (Read 578 times)

PG monster · « **on:** September 17, 2001, 02:24:00 PM »

Aircraft Errors

the MC.202 error: The correct 12.7mm ammoload is 360 or 370 rpg; 400 rpg is wrong. Historically, all MC.202 could carry 320kg of
bombs; in AH, it can't carry any load.

the Lavochkin error: The La-5 and La-7 have bombs now, but they havn't attack configuration.

the Shturmovik error: The Il-2 was very rugged plane historically, but in the game it is an easy prey.

the ‘47 error: This plane carries only 10 troopers in the game. Historically it carried much more, 10 is OK for ground transports.

the Ju88 error: Historically, this plane carried much more bombs.

the Typhoon error: Historically, this plane could carry drop tanks and rockets.

Mitsu · « **Reply #1 on:** September 17, 2001, 04:05:00 PM »

It's a Bug Report.

Mitsu

Superfly · « **Reply #2 on:** September 17, 2001, 04:29:00 PM »

The Typhoon does carry drop tanks and rockets.

Nashwan · « **Reply #3 on:** September 17, 2001, 04:42:00 PM »

It should be able to carry 2 tanks and 4 rockets at the same time, not just tanks or rockets.

Hristo · « **Reply #4 on:** September 17, 2001, 05:00:00 PM »

Gondolas on 109 fire from slightly below of the barrell position. Tested on G-10 while parked on runway. Some 20 centimeters, I'd say.

Wilbus · « **Reply #5 on:** September 22, 2001, 07:44:00 AM »

Reason C47 has got 10 troops is because all that is needed to take a field is 10 troops, if they added, 30 or whatever it had in R/L it would be alot easier to take a field, you wouldn't need all troops to get in.

Not sure about the JU88, it carries more bombs in AH then the B17 in AH. On the other hand, the B17 could carry more if it was only flown short distances.

Allso, the IL-2 WAS very rugged, so was the P47 and 190 etc. However, it seems to be alot easier to fire in AH and in gernarl pilots hit betweeen 7-12% og what they fire. In R/L it was alot harder to hit something so pilots fired alot more and hit alot less then we do, the IL-2 can take something between 5-10x20mm hits wich is fairly accurate, in R/L it took longer to hit it with 5-10 rounds though.

[ 09-22-2001: Message edited by: Wilbus ]

SFRT - Frenchy · « **Reply #6 on:** September 22, 2001, 09:12:00 AM »

The IL2 is rugged in AH, it's one of the rare plane who can take 2-3 Ostwind 40mm in the wing. Other planes, including P47, 1 ping and here goes your wing.

SKurj · « **Reply #7 on:** September 22, 2001, 09:12:00 AM »

I've not found any info that states JU88 carried more bombs. I have seen it reported it could carry a couple of 2000kg bombs though. There maybe other types it could carry, 100kg for example and 1000kg AP and 1000kg GP

SKurj

brady · « **Reply #8 on:** September 22, 2001, 09:34:00 AM »

Their are lots of planes that can cary bombs that do not have an atack Button, it is quiet perplexing.

pdog_109 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 22, 2001, 09:41:00 AM »

The IL-2 is all wrong. I think they put too much on it, real Il-2M3 which is modeled couldn't carry that much stuff because it was very heavy from extra armor. This extra armor doesn't do a dam good.

"2-3 Ostwind 40mm in the wing"
Isn't it 37mm?

LOL! I got shot down by a m16 at 1.2 range with a couple of pings in my tail.

Kingonads · « **Reply #10 on:** September 22, 2001, 12:06:00 PM »

PG I am tring to figure out what U mean aboutt he 202, 1 12.7mm or .50cal round does not way 1kg so whats the ammo load out and the bomb loadout have to do with each other U made no connection between the 2 please clearify for me I am just stumped.

Hodo